|

< Return to Village Government
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 19, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was called to
order on Monday, December 19, 2011 at 6:15 pm at 1600 Dublin Rd. All
members of Council, the Village Solicitor, and Village Engineer were
present to tour the building. Following the tour,
Mr. Sterneker moved the meeting be closed to reconvene
at 1581 Cambridge Blvd. Mr. Roark seconded and the motion passed
unanimously.
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was reconvened
on Monday, December 19, 2011 at 1581 Cambridge Blvd. – Trinity
Methodist Church - at 7:00 pm. Those in attendance were: Council
Members: David. T. Roark, Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda
J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E.
Studebaker, Village Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer,
Louis McFarland, and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay. Visitors and press
were present.
Mayor Studebaker
reported on Council’s tour of the former NiSource property at 1600
Dublin Rd.
VARIANCES AND PERMITS
Mayor
Studebaker presented proposed sign permits for the building at 1600
Dublin Rd. He also presented an email from Mr. McFarland recommending
the permits be approved.
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of exterior wall and ground sign permits for 1600 Dublin Rd.
Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2314-11, 2012 ANNUAL
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE.
Mr. Kukura
asked if the appropriation ordinance reflects any adjustments related
to the ongoing service contract discussions. Ms. McKay stated that no
adjustments had been made, but the ordinance can be amended in the
future.
Mr.
Cincione asked Mr. Banchefsky if approving the appropriation ordinance
could be interpreted as tacit or implicit authority to the Mayor to do
something not approved by the Council. Mr. Banchefsky stated, “None,
whatsoever.” Mr. Cincione asked if the Mayor would have authority to
contract for solid waste services without Council approval under his
authority to provide for the health and safety of the residents. Mr.
Banchefsky stated the Mayor has no such authority.
Mr. Roark moved the adoption of O-2314-11. Ms. Troiano seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
Ms. McKay
presented a summary of the expenses related to the annual Holiday
Party. The bill for the poinsettias has not been received. The report
included a summary of how “leftovers” were distributed and a tally of
RSVP’s received.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2316-11, An Ordinance
adopting a contract for Police, Emergency Medical and Fire Prevention
and Suppression Services, Recreational Facilities, Solid Waste
Collection, Maintenance Services, and Other Public Services with the
City of ________________, Ohio, and directing the Mayor to sign the
contract.
Mayor
Studebaker stated in order to pass the ordinance 4 members of Council
will need to approve the ordinance and he reminded those present that
Mr. Cincione would be abstaining from discussion of and vote on
O-2316-11. Mayor Studebaker opened the floor for members of Council to
comment.
Mr. Roark
suggested that it would be helpful for Council members to share their
position on the two options being considered for the Village service
contract. Mr. Roark stated he has heard many comments from the
community, especially from those in favor of retaining Grandview
Heights (GH) to provide Village services. Mr. Roark stated that the
quality of services provided by GH is excellent and that is not in
question in the Council’s decision process. He stated he has lived in
MC for 18 years and has two children who attended and graduated from
the GH schools. Mr. Roark expressed his opinion that it is the schools
and the community activities which tie GH and MC together and not the
service contract. He also stated his opinion that Council’s first
obligation is to the Village and its residents – not only current
residents, but also future residents. Mr. Roark stated that a service
contract with Upper Arlington (UA) represents an unknown and it is not
unusual for people to fear change, but he believes that it is unfair
to suggest that UA cannot provide the level of services expected by
the residents of MC. Therefore, Mr. Roark stated, he would favor
awarding the service contract to UA.
Ms.
Siefkas stated her support for awarding the service contract to UA
because the decision would be in the best interest of the Village now
and in the long term. She stated that the question before the Council
is not one of quality; GH has provided very high quality services
through the years. She stated that if all else were equal; she would
be in favor of continuing to contract with GH, but the decision will
impact the sustainability of the Village as an independent community.
She also stated her concern that, if the Village does not address
financial challenges now, the Village will be forced to significantly
raise taxes which could drive residents out of the community and
discourage people from moving into the community. The UA proposal
offers value for the Village’s dollar and high quality services and
extras. Ms. Siefkas stated that, if safety were jeopardized, she would
not support the move to UA services, but that is not an issue. She
stated her belief that UA services would be comparable to GH services
in quality.
Ms. Siefkas also
stated that MC residents have supported Council action to compare
costs when considering expenditure of Village money. She stated MC has
received two, high quality proposals and she supports awarding the
contract to UA because that choice will allow the Village to continue
to improve MC’s fiscal position without limiting services or
immediately increasing taxes.
Mr. Kukura
asked if the ordinance under consideration has the same language as
adopted in the past. Ms. McKay confirmed that the language is the
same. Mr. Kukura suggested the ordinance language should be amended to
require the contract to be brought back to Council for approval after
a final contract is negotiated.
Mr. Kukura
stated he has not lived in MC for very long, but has two young
children in GH schools and plans to live in the Village until his
children graduate from GH schools. Mr. Kukura stated that he enjoys
the quaint nature of the community and his intention is to maintain
that quality. He stated that the Village financial forecast shows MC
solvent through 2016. Mr. Kukura said the Village is not in a
financial crisis and there is not a need to make a change in the
services provider at this time. He stated that UA has excellent police
services, but the difference in size and life style between UA and GH
will make it difficult for UA to provide the level of all services
currently provided by GH to MC.
Mr. Kukura stated his
opinion that, regardless of the decision made, MC may have to raise
taxes to ensure financial stability. He stated his opinion that the
price difference is not worth the change and he will support
continuing to contract with GH for Village services.
Mr.
Sterneker stated he believes that it is important to listen to the
people and what they want. The majority of people he has heard from
support retaining GH for Village services and Council should listen to
those opinions. He stated he is concerned about the Village’s
financial health, but believes that the changes which Council has made
and the improvements in occupancy of Village business buildings is
positively impacting MC financial situation. Mr. Sterneker stated
that, when residents expressed to him their desire to remain with GH,
he cautioned them that the choice might require residents to pay for
the services through fees or additional taxes. He reported no one he
spoke with said “no” to the possibility of fees or increased taxes.
Mr. Sterneker stated that residents want to stay with GH services and
he will support awarding the service contract to GH.
Ms.
Troiano stated that she is basing her position on several points. She
stated she is tied to GH through her family and long term residency in
GH and MC. She also stated she is tied to GH through her father-in-law
who was GH Service Director for many years. Ms. Troiano stated it has
been difficult to make a decision given the many relationships she has
with people in GH and UA. Ms. Troiano stated her opinion that the
question is one of money, but not only money. She confirmed that GH
provides wonderful service and MC officials and residents have
excellent relationships with GH service providers. Ms. Troiano stated
her opinion that the MC residents are giving GH all the credit for
those services and relationships and are not recognizing the active
part MC officials and staff play in creating and maintaining the
services and the relationships with GH. She stated that she is
concerned about keeping the taxes low to attract home owners and
businesses. Ms. Troiano stated that to keep the Village financially
sound and independently viable now and in the future she will support
awarding the service contract to UA.
Mr.
Sterneker stated he is concerned that moving the service contract to
UA and forcing residents to pay non-resident rates for GH Parks and
Recreation will impact families that have children participating in
activities with their school friends and GH playmates. He stated he
would prefer to put money toward the cost differential of remaining
with GH.
Mr. Kukura
stated that if MC awards the service contract to UA, GH will need to
identify ways to raise revenue and could significantly increase
non-resident rates for Parks and Recreation activities. He reminded
Council that 115 people signed a petition asking the Council to award
the service contract to GH believing that signing the letter was as
good as writing a letter to express their position. Mr. Kukura stated
the GH police visit the 4th graders at GH schools to meet
and get to know the students. He expressed concern about whether the
UA police would get to know MC children in a similar way. He stated
his opinion that awarding the contract to UA and sending MC children
to UA activities will further separate GH and MC which would be a loss
for both communities.
Mr. Roark
stated he is concerned that continuing with GH will make MC
permanently linked to GH’s budget and subject to what GH’s Council
believes it can “extract” from MC. MC’s Council needs to make hard
financial decisions to care for MC. He reiterated his opinion that
relationships between people in MC and GH are not based on the service
contract. He stated that “as a business model” to insure the long term
financial health of the Village the UA proposal is the better option.
Mr.
Sterneker stated his opinion that the current differential between the
GH and UA proposals is $57,000 per year. When annual “billables” of
approximately $25,000 are added to the differential the resulting
additional “cost” per MC household is $350 per year. He stated his
opinion that the difference is not worth risking the unknown of UA
service level and quality. He also stated that MC does not hire the
least expensive legal counsel or engineering, but rather looks for
quality services that reflect the expectations of Village Officials
and residents.
Ms Siefkas
stated Council has heard from vocal residents who are, for the most
part, property owners. She said we have not heard from almost half the
Village population that rent or lease their homes in the Village. Any
increase in taxes will ultimately be passed on to those residents in
rent. She also stated that 1/3 of the Village population is 65 or
older and higher taxes might create a burden for those people and
reduce their willingness to support future school levies. She stated
that Council represents those people as well and must consider the
impact of their decision on renters and older residents.
Mayor
Studebaker reminded Council that some items listed as “billables” in
the GH proposal are considered part of the base cost in the UA
proposal. Snow plowing is included in the UA base proposal while the
GH base proposal does not include $15,000 to $17,000 each year in snow
plowing. Mayor Studebaker stated the UA proposal also offers services
that could reduce MC’s Mayor’s Court costs.
Mr. Kukura
stated that many of the renters are students and transient residents
that the Council represents, but he believes long time residents
comments should be weighed more heavily in the decision. Mr. Kukura
stated MC is not going to run out of money anytime soon. He also
stated 1600 Dublin Rd. will bring in revenue and stabilize Village
revenue. He stated his opinion that MC should continue to contract
with GH and allow the Village’s revenue to continue to stabilize. Mr.
Kukura stated that lending institutions approached during the process
of refinancing the bond considered the long term financial health of
the Village and were willing to offer the refinancing at a low
interest rate. If they had considered the Village a risk, the interest
rate offered would have been higher.
Ms.
Siefkas stated that if MC continues to overspend on the service
contract there will be other projects that the Village will not be
able to afford.
Mr. Kukura
stated that a change to UA would not significantly impact fire
protection services. He said the police service will be slightly
different and the trash and solid waste services will be significantly
different. He stated that Rumpke would not provide the same “extra
eyes” for the police department that the GH services provide. Mr.
Kukura stated that the Village Hall is only staffed in the morning and
if there is a problem residents are comfortable contacting GH, but
would not be comfortable calling Rumpke. He stated that the services
provided by GH create a sense peace of mind when he is traveling.
Mayor
Studebaker stated the geography of the area plays a role in the
decision. GH and MC are two municipalities with one school district.
The area actually is made up of GH, MC and the City of Columbus. The
schools are an important part of the community, but the communities
have their own interests that have to be attended to. Mayor Studebaker
pointed out that MC is being asked to consider the impact of their
decision on GH’s budget situation. But not many people have asked who
is going to fill the hole in our budget? Where is our white knight? He
stated MC has to be primarily concerned with balancing the sentiment
of the community with the budget issues facing the community.
Mr. Kukura moved Ordinance O-2316-11 be amended to
remove the language in the title and section 1 directing the Mayor to
“sign the contract” and replace it with language instructing the Mayor
to “negotiate the contract and bring the contract to Council for
approval.” Mr. Roark seconded the motion to amend.
Mr. Banchefsky
stated amending the motion requires only 3 votes to approve the
amendments, but 4 votes are required to approve the Ordinance. The
motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Roark
moved Ordinance O-2316-11 be amended to designate the “City of Upper
Arlington.” Ms. Siefkas seconded the motion to amend. The motion
passed 3 in favor, 2 opposed.
Mr. Roark
moved approval of amended Ordinance O-2316-11, An Ordinance adopting a
contract for Police, Emergency Medical and Fire Prevention and
Suppression Services, Recreational Facilities, Solid Waste
Collection, Maintenance Services, and Other Public Services with
the City of Upper Arlington, Ohio, and directing the Mayor to
negotiate the contract and bring the contract to Council for approval.
Ms. Troiano seconded. The Council requested a roll call vote: Mr.
Roark, yes; Mr. Kukura, no; Ms. Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker, no; Ms.
Troiano, yes. Mr. Cincione abstained. The Ordinance did not pass.
Mayor
Studebaker explained the options for moving forward. The Council could
continue debate and discussion. An individual voting on the prevailing
side could move to reconsider the Ordinance and vote with the name of
GH amended into the reconsidered Ordinance. Mr. Sterneker suggested
Council move to other business and continue to address the service
contract at a future meeting. Council concurred. Mayor Studebaker
thanked all who have participated in the process to date and said the
next opportunity for Council to work on the process will be the
regular January 2012 Council meeting.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2317-11, An Ordinance
adopting a contract for Solid Waste Collection with
______________________, and directing the Mayor to sign the contract.
Mr. Cincione expressed concerns about aspects of the Rumpke contract
that would allow certain costs to escalate over the course the five
year contract. He stated that, if MC’s financial situation is as dire
as has been suggested; the Village should limit the cost of solid
waste collection to curb side service only to save collection costs.
Ms Troiano stated the
Village asked for services as close as possible to what GH provides.
Ms. Troiano pointed out that all three proposals received by the
Village offer curb side service. She agreed that the Village should
consider the lower cost option. Mayor Studebaker pointed out that
there is very little difference in cost between the proposals for GH
and Rumpke for carry-out service. He reminded Council that GH was
asked to provide the quote for solid waste collection separately but
declined to do so. Mayor Studebaker noted that the RFP process has
allowed MC to identify truer market costs for the services required by
the Village. Mr. Cincione stated he has been very pleased and
impressed with the participation of the community in the service
contract and solid waste collection contract process.
No action
was taken.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2320-11, An Ordinance
providing for additional legal counsel for the Village of Marble
Cliff, Ohio, authorizing the employment of assistants in connection
with the prosecution of criminal and traffic cases in the Municipal
Court of Franklin County, Ohio, setting compensation of said
assistants, and authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract with
the City Attorney of Columbus, Ohio, to accomplish such purposes.
Council discussed options for prosecutorial services.
Mr. Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Roark seconded. The
motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of
O-2320-11. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr. Roark moved
acceptance of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Sterneker seconded. The Consent
Agenda was approved unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor Studebaker had
no report for Council.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr. McFarland had no
report for Council.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
No report for Council.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the December 2011 bills totaling $73,978.91. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation: $250.00 from
1000-130-311-0000 to 1000-190-399-0000 for underground utility
location services. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Ms. McKay presented a
proposed schedule for 2012 regular Council meetings holding the
meetings on the third Monday of each month.
Mr. Roark moved
approval of the proposed 2012 regular Council meeting schedule. Mr.
Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Roark moved the
Fiscal Officer be instructed to process and pay all routine bills
received prior to year end. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mr. Roark moved the
approval of a payment of $250.00 to Trinity Methodist Church for use
of the church’s facility for two November Council meetings and two
December council meetings. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr.
Cincione suggested Council hire a consultant to perform an independent
financial review for the Village and assist in long range financial
planning. He noted that it has been over 10 years since the Village
hired Wade Steen to perform such a review at the time when the
purchase of the Tarpy Woods was under consideration. He stated a
consultant could provide the Village with additional information about
options that would improve the Village’s financial position. Mr. Roark
asked for a better definition of what
Mr. Cincione is
suggesting. Mr. Cincione suggested a consultant might be able to
better identify the business potential of the Village and refine the
assumptions that are being made regarding long term budgeting and
financial projections. Ms. McKay stated she would welcome any
assistance that Council believes would be helpful. Mr. Kukura
confirmed that revenue projection is very difficult and a consultant
would be helpful. He stated a consultant might also be able to
identify the level of property tax increase that might be required to
fund the Village. Mr. Kukura also pointed out that after the bond is
paid off in 9 years, the Village will enjoy a significant reduction in
expense. Mayor Studebaker stated the Village cash reserves have had an
impact on the Village’s ability to refinance its bond and obtain OPWC
grants and loans. He asked Council to review the long range plans for
major capital expenses that the Village will have to undertake.
Ms. Troiano stated
that the Village may have to consider directly hiring companies or
individuals to perform Village services rather than outsourcing the
work. She said that option could be part of the options a consultant
might investigate. Ms. Siefkas commented that the Village is also
going to have to investigate options within the Tri-Village area for
additional cooperation between municipalities.
Mr. Cincione moved the
Mayor be asked to identify financial and/or planning consultants who
would be able to review the Village’s short term and long term
financial position and identify opportunities to increase revenue
and/or reduce expenses. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Council
asked the Fiscal Officer to make the Wade Steen report available to
Council for review. Council also suggested that the Fiscal Officer
continue to provide detailed financial information on a regular
basis.
Council
thanked Mr. Sterneker for his work putting up and maintaining the
holiday lighting display.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the three re-elected officials will be sworn into
office individually as their schedule permits.
ADJOURN
Mr. Cincione moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Sterneker seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 2011
A special meeting of
the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Wednesday,
December 14, 2011 at 1581 Cambridge Blvd. – Trinity Methodist Church -
at 7:00 pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T.
Roark, Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert
W. Sterneker and Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village
Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky, Administrative Assistant William
Johannes, and Fiscal Officer Cynthia McKay. Approximately 50 visitors
and press were present.
Mayor
Studebaker opened the special meeting by welcoming those in attendance
and stating the evening’s discussion would constitute the second
reading of O-2316-11, An Ordinance adopting a contract for Police,
Emergency Medical and Fire Prevention and Suppression Services,
Recreational Facilities, Solid Waste Collection, Maintenance
Services, and Other Public Services with the City of __________,
Ohio, and directing the Mayor to sign the contract.
Mayor
Studebaker also stated the evening’s discussion will stand as the
second reading of O-2317-11, An Ordinance adopting a contract for
Solid Waste Collection with ______________________, and directing the
Mayor to sign the contract.
Mayor
Studebaker stated that the Council would observe the rule requiring a
minimum of three readings of a legislative action and, therefore, no
action would be taken on the two ordinances at the evening’s meeting.
Both items will receive their third reading at the regular Council
meeting on December 19, 2011.
Mayor
Studebaker summarized the process to date including efforts in 2010 to
identify ways to increase Village revenues and reduce costs. He
explained the process to obtain bids through SWACO for solid waste
collection followed by the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to
collect proposals for provision of Village services. Mayor Studebaker
explained the steps taken to finalize the RFP’s. Attendees were given
a financial summary of the RFP responses.
Mayor
Studebaker stated representatives of Grandview Heights (GH) and Upper
Arlington (UA) would be given an opportunity to address Council to
highlight aspects of their responses. He stated there would be an
opportunity to ask questions of the two communities and the attendees
would have the opportunity to address Council and ask questions. Mayor
Studebaker asked that those interested in speaking to sign the
“Request to Speak” sheet. He also asked that those who have spoken to
Council before who do not have new information to share to hold
comments in the interest of limiting the time and length of the
meeting.
Mayor
Studebaker stated that since the last meeting the Village Hall has
received six public contacts regarding the service contract; three in
favor of remaining with GH and three in favor of contracting with UA.
Mayor Studebaker also read a cover letter attached to petitions with
“over 115 signatures” supporting renewal of the service contract with
GH. The heading of the petition stated, “Citizens Petition to the
Marble Cliff Village Council to Renew the Services Contract with
Grandview Heights. We support renewing the Grandview Heights Service
contract for three additional years. We recognize that Grandview
Heights has provided us with decades of outstanding services.” The
cover letter was signed by Mary Hayes, Lynda and Rich Murray, JoAnn
and Greg Taylor, and Ralph and Joan Talmadge.
Mayor
Studebaker explained that Council Member Matt Cincione was present,
but not seated at the Council table. He is abstaining from discussion
and vote on the service contract proposals because of a conflict of
interest. Mr. Cincione’s abstention does not alter the requirement
that the ordinance authorizing the Village to enter into a service
agreement will require 4 votes in favor.
Mayor
Studebaker reported UA and GH both responded to the Village’s second
Request for Proposal (RFP), submitting their proposals in compliance
with the Dec. 5, 2011 deadline established by the Village. He
explained that UA does not provide solid waste services so, in the
interest of a balanced comparison, the Village has included the cost
of the bid received through SWACO from Rumpke added to the proposal
from UA. Mayor Studebaker explained the contents of the handout
provided to attendees summarizing the two communities’ proposals.
Mayor
Studebaker stated UA and GH would each be given 15 minutes to present
their proposals to the Council. Mr. Banchefsky selected the first
speaker by pulling a name out of a bowl. UA was selected as the first
presenter.
Ted Staton,
City Manager for UA, presented the UA proposal. Mr. Staton first
introduced Joe Valentino, Assistant City Manager, Emma Speight, Media
Affairs Director, Brian Quinn, UA Police Chief, and Jeff Young, UA
Fire Chief.
Mr. Staton
reported that the officials and staff in UA worked very hard to
prepare a proposal that would provide the residents of Marble Cliff
with an exceptional level of service. He stated that the proposal was
presented at the request of the Village and UA responded in good faith
to the request. Mr. Staton stated his opinion that the initial UA
proposal fully complied with the initial request and the request for
an amended proposal. Mr. Staton stated his opinion that the UA
proposal is superior to the GH proposal in cost and services. Further
he stated and the proposal offers substantial savings to the Village
and offers additional and supplemental services beyond the base
services requested by the RFP that would be of great value to the
Village.
Mr. Staton
stated UA has long enjoyed a positive relationship with the Village.
UA Fire Department routinely provides mutual aid to both MC and GH. UA
considers the residents of the Village to be their neighbors and the
elected and appointed officials to be their partners. MC would not be
just a “line item” in their budget. Mr. Staton stated that UA also
considers GH to be neighbors and partners and have worked
collaboratively with GH in a variety of ways. Mr. Staton stated that
the current process will not impact or alter the way UA works with MC
and GH and suggested that the process may even result in the
identification of other ways the three communities can work together
to the benefit of all.
Mr. Staton
summarized what he described as “the superior aspects” of the UA
proposal. Those items included:
1.
Eight decades of
excellent police services to the residents of UA. The UAPD is an
international accredited police agency with 49 professionals. The UAPD
provides a full range of police services including full investigation
of crime, safety education, and a volunteer police program.
2.
Kind Call, Project
Life Saver and Speed Monitoring services are available through UA.
3.
Mayor’s Court and
legal support services including prosecution in Franklin County
Municipal Court. The Court provides additional services such as
juvenile diversion programs and probation monitoring.
4.
Eight
decades of excellent fire services. The UAFD includes 54 fully trained
professionals, 2 engines and 2 medic vehicles staffed twenty four
hours a day and backup equipment. The UAFD also sponsors “Stay UA”
that helps older residents stay independent in their homes and free
Knox Box keying. Mr. Staton also stated that if UA is awarded the
service contract they will install a signal system in the W. Fifth
Ave. traffic lights that will allow fire equipment to change the
signal to stop traffic on W. Fifth Ave. as emergency vehicles approach
to cross into MC.
5.
Parks
and Recreation has numerous facilities and over 600 recreational and
educational programs.
6.
The
Public Service Department provides full services including leaf
pick-up, street and street light maintenance. Snow removal, salting
and street sweeping are included in the base UA bid without extra
billing.
7.
The
Development Department is fully staffed for building review and
inspections, permitting and architectural services.
Mr. Staton summarized
the benefits of the UA proposal: 1) Lower costs; 2) Add-ons; and 3)
additional services to the residents of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Staton
stated that in the current economic environment communities need to
look at alternate ways to meet the challenges that face them. He
stated UA would work quickly to put services in place and would reach
out to Village residents to create rapport and offer a seamless
transition in services for the community. He stated that UA has the
highest bond rating available and enjoys financial stability.
Mayor Studebaker
recognized Grandview Heights Mayor Ray DeGraw.
Mayor
DeGraw stated he has been an elected official in GH for over 20 years
and has participated in a number of service negotiations with MC over
the years. He stated MC was always “poor” and GH was always trying to
control costs and after negotiations, at least 4 members of each
Council had to be convinced that good choices had been made. He stated
this is the first time that the negotiations have reached this point
and he is worried about the outcome. Mayor DeGraw stated MC and GH are
two jurisdictions, but they are one community joined by schools and
community activities and services.
Mayor
DeGraw introduced Pat Bowman, Economic Development Director; ob
Dvoraczky, Finance Director; David Wood, Police Chief; Steve Shaner,
Fire Chief and members of the GH City Council.
Mayor
DeGraw stated GH and MC face similar economic challenges and both
communities are stronger when they work together. He suggested there
are three areas of service where GH can provide superior services to
the Village; police protection, fire services, streets and sanitation.
He stated that the GHPD is also internationally certified as is the
UAPD. Mayor DeGraw reported that GHPD provides 8.2 officers per square
mile of jurisdiction and UAPD provides 5 officers per square mile of
jurisdiction. He stated that GH police officers understand our
community and know MC residents and MC children.
The second
area is the Sanitation and Street Department. The sanitation employees
are the best representatives to the community. They know the people,
they know what is going on; they are another set of eyes to the police
department and they are truly committed to providing service
excellence. Sanitation department employees routinely suggest ways to
improve GH services to their residents and MC residents. The street
maintenance services are excellent – particularly with snow removal.
Mayor
DeGraw stated the third area of superior services is the GHFD. He
stated 5 professionals are always on duty and a minimum of 3 of the
five are paramedics. GH makes fewer than 900 runs a year as compared
to 1600 per station for UA, making GH more available. The GH Fire
Captains are trained to act as Battalion Chiefs. GH is one of two
Ohio fire departments that meet the National Fire Prevention
guidelines of responding to calls an average of 90% of the time in
less than 6 minutes. GHFD’s average response time is 3.23 minutes from
the time the call is received to arrival on the scene.
Mayor
DeGraw agreed that UA has more Parks and Recreation facilities and
programs than GH. But he pointed out that MC residents want to
participate with their friends, neighbors, schoolmates and playmates
in the GH programs. Mayor DeGraw stated GH is continuing to work with
other communities to improve and facilitate Mayor’s Court services.
Mayor DeGraw pointed out the ongoing economic development activities
in GH which benefit the GH schools. Both communities will be stronger
and better if they work together to improve the GH schools. Mayor
DeGraw summarized his presentation by stating that mayors answer to a
lot of different people including residents, council members, and
employees. He stated when a new employee is hired the employer is
looking for a good fit. GH and MC are a better fit than UA and MC. He
stated MC is part of the fabric of the entire community. GH has a
proven record of providing excellent services to MC and the
relationship between the two communities should be continued.
Mr. Kukura
asked for the population and area of both UA and GH. Officials from
the two communities responded: UA - 34,000 residents and 9.5
square miles; GH – 6,700 residents and 1.7 square miles
Ms.
Siefkas thanked both communities for participating in the RFP process.
She summarized some of the positive aspects of GH police protection as
expressed by MC residents including the strong police presence in the
Village, foot patrols, familiarity with our community and our
children. She asked UA to speak to those aspects of UA police
services. Mr. Staton stated that UA residents’ satisfaction with
police and fire are “off the charts.” The police maintain a presence
in schools and have a strong presence on the streets. Chief Quinn
stated the police department deploys bicycle and walking patrols. The
UAPD has also made use of Citizen Police Academy volunteers in
unmarked cars to place additional observers on the street to assist
the police department. He stated the UAPD is active in the “Walk Your
Child to School” program with officers present in the 13 schools when
appropriate.
David
Roark expressed that a change to UA services would have challenges and
a learning curve would be part of the process for both communities.
Mr. Roark stated that residents’ satisfaction with services is his
major concern. He asked how UA knows their residents are satisfied
with the services provided. Mr. Staton explained UA does periodic
surveys to determine satisfaction and areas of concern with residents.
The survey covers a wide range of public services, not only police and
fire. The police and fire services are routinely rated very highly in
the surveys. He stated other benchmarks are available.
Mr. Staton stated UA
has a highly satisfactory rating by national FBI crime rating
statistics.
Ms. Speight stated she
has been personally involved with 3 community surveys during her time
as Media Affairs Director for UA. The 2010 survey was part of the
National Cities Survey. UA police and fire services ranked at the top
the 3 areas for the services surveyed and compared to other cities
which participated in the survey, UA rated “off the chart.”
Ms.
Troiano expressed that MC enjoys the ability to “pick up the phone”
and be in contact with Chief Wood and Chief Shaner. Ms. Troiano asked
what level of questioning on specifics is included in the surveys
utilized by UA. She also asked if UA is aware of how many senior
citizens are cared for through the UA programs. Ms. Speight stated the
2010 National Cities Survey included fairly general questions. However
the survey which UA takes every three years is more community
specific. Chief Quinn stated the survey is sent randomly to
individuals who have had specific encounters with community officials
including individuals who have received citations or have been
arrested by UA police officers. He commented that even those people
report a satisfactory experience with the City. Ms. Speight stated the
Kind Call program is widely available for elderly and individuals with
special needs . The participants receive a phone call every day and if
they do not answer a process is started to check on them directly.
Participants in the Kind Call program receive an annual visit from a
representative of the police or fire department to check on the
residents as well as the checking the smoke detectors in the home and
identify any safety concerns. She also explained the “Stay UA” program
through the UAFD. If the UAFD identifies a situation where an elderly
resident is experiencing difficulties in their home they can arrange
for the resident to work with the service coordinator to arrange for
services that can help keep them safely in their home. She stated UA
has a very high percentage of elderly residents when compared to other
communities. Mr. Staton commented that the “Stay UA” program recently
won a national award at the most recent International Cities
Management Association Conference.
Ms.
Troiano asked how UA would begin to develop relationships between MC
residents and the fire and police departments. Mr. Staton stated the
standard communications tools including a presence in the Village,
door to door contact as well as community meetings to provide an
opportunity for getting familiar and acquainted. Meetings would
include having the MC residents meet the UA safety officials with
which they are most likely to come in contact.
Mr.
Sterneker stated one of his concerns with police protection is related
to the number of children who walk to and from school activities,
especially in the evening. He asked if the residents and children
would see the same level of a police presence by UA as we have with GH
during those hours. Mr. Staton stated the intent of the proposal is to
provide the same level of services from UA as have been received from
GH. Chief Quinn stated UA schedules a minimum of 5 officers and 1
supervisor 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Mr. Sterneker asked if the
patrols are assigned to a specific area. UA keeps a patrol in each of
the identified sections of the jurisdiction, but back-up from the
central areas and, if the situation requires, from all areas is
available 24/7.
Mr. Kukura
stated his appreciation that the communities are trying to identify
opportunities to work together and enjoy the financial benefits of
shared services. Mr. Kukura asked about the UA Fire stations and
equipment. Chief Young explained UA has two fire houses – one (Station
72) on Reed Rd. immediately north of Hastings Middle School and one
(Station 71) on Arlington Ave. across from Jones Middle School.
Station 71 houses an engineer rescue (pumper truck) and a medic
vehicle. Station 72 houses the ladder truck and a medic vehicle as
well as the battalion chief and the training and EMS staff.
Mr. Kukura
asked for an explanation of “Project Life Saver.” Ms. Speight
explained that the program is designed to aid individuals with
conditions such as Alzheimer ’s disease. The program provides a
monitoring device that aids in locating an individual who may be lost
or has wandered away from home or a care giver.
Mayor Studebaker
shared a number of questions received from residents
1.
To
Grandview Heights – How would MC moving the service contract to UA
impact GH personnel? Mayor DeGraw stated the service personnel are
investigating options for increasing revenue by serving more
commercial locations. He stated that the MC contract represents
approximately 6% of their budget and that loss would have to be made
up in some fashion yet to be determined. Mr. Bowman stated that GH
would probably have to go to the voters for additional tax revenue.
2.
If the
contract is awarded to UA would our residents and children be treated
as non-residents in GH Parks and Recreation facilities and programs?
Mr. Bowman said that the policy would have to be looked at and a
decision made.
3.
The
original RFP response included a fee for Parks and Recreation. Is that
fee included in the revised RFP response? Mayor DeGraw stated it isn’t
really a fee but the cost of providing recreational areas to the
schools. So the amount included in the proposal is mutual support of
the schools by GH and MC. He suggested the communities and schools
might form a group to identify park and recreational requirements for
the community and the schools; then identify ways of funding those
requirements.
4.
To Upper
Arlington – If the service contract is awarded to UA, is there
adequate staffing in place or would additional man power be required?
If so, how does UA plan to meet staffing needs? Mr. Staton stated that
staff has discussed the question and they have determined that
additional staff could be hired, but a better solution would probably
be to make use of overtime to meet needs.
Mayor Studebaker
opened the floor for attendees who signed the “Request to Speak”
form.
Steve
Reynolds, GH Council President, expressed his thanks for the
opportunity to speak. He stated GH has provided excellent services for
many years. The communities are connected through schools, activities
and geography. Mr. Reynolds stated GH is very interested in continuing
to provide services and his opinion that GH and MC are better and
stronger together.
Linda
Johnson expressed her concern that UA officials may experience fatigue
if forced to work overtime. Ms. Johnson stated that she lives in MC,
works in GH, and attends church and shops in UA. She stated she
regularly sees police patrol cars as she moves between the GH and MC
but, when going through UA she rarely sees police vehicles except at
North Star at Doone Rd. and north of Lane Ave. Ms. Johnson asked how
many patrol cars does UA have and how many does GH have? She stated
her second question is about snow removal. She said friends in UA have
reported that secondary streets receive plowing and salting for the
first snow fall of the season, but after that plowing and salting does
not occur on a timely basis. What is the UA street plowing plan? Mr.
Valentino said he was surprised to hear the complaint and asked if Ms.
Johnson would provide the resident’s name so he can make a contact to
gather additional information. Mr. Valentino explained the policy is
that streets are plowed within 24 hours of a snow fall. Streets
surrounding schools are plowed first, then main roads and then
secondary roads. Mayor DeGraw stated that GH has the same policy, but
GH has fewer road miles to attend to. Chief Quinn stated UA has 12
patrol cars along with unmarked vehicles and supervisor and special
vehicles. Chief Wood stated GH has 7 vehicles and 3 officers on the
road at all times.
Ashley
Troiano stated her family is made up of multi-generational GH and MC
residents. Family members are graduates of the GH schools and her
grandfather was the GH service director for 55 years and had a
wonderful experience growing up in the community. She stated she has
lived in UA. She expressed her opinion that it would be unfair not to
award the contract to UA and the lower cost and excellent services of
UA would be in the best interest of MC.
Ken Frick
stated the level of services provided by GH is excellent, but the
service contract is a fiscal issue not a school issue. He stated GH
has received a 5% increase each year in the last contract. Mr. Frick
stated the Village cannot financially sustain that rate of increase
and he expressed his concern that the ongoing costs, if not contained,
will result in the end of MC as an independent community and the sign
of Dublin Rd. will read “Welcome to Grandview Heights” within his
lifetime. Mr. Frick expressed his opinion that MC should contract with
UA and enjoy the savings provided and avoid additional taxation of
residents and businesses.
Mike
Martina stated he has been a MC resident for over 50 years and the
fire and police response time is wonderful. He asked the location of
the nearest UA fire and medic units. He stated GH has fabulous
facilities for our children and the services provided by GH are
excellent. He stated his opinion that it would be a mistake to move
the service contract to UA. Mr. Staton stated the nearest fire and
medic units are at the Arlington Ave. station which is .7 of a mile
away from W. Fifth Ave.
Liz
Koelker, GH Council Member, stated fees for services in GH are lower
for building permitting and inspection – residents will be shocked by
the difference in cost. She also provided her calculation that the
cost difference between the GH and UA proposals is $.35 per day per
resident. She stated MC would be taking a big risk for very little
money. Ms. Koelker expressed her opinion that the community is really
not two separate communities, they are collaborative communities that
need to be working together to remain independent. Mayor Studebaker
stated that building permit fees and inspection fees are established
by MC not by any other community. It is not MC’s intention to become
part of any other community, but to remain independent and fiscally
responsible for MC.
Ken Ellis
stated he is happy with the long relationship between MC and GH. He
provided his calculation that the cost differential between the two
communities’ proposals is equal to less than $100 per person per year.
He stated MC should consider increasing revenue to insure financial
well being. Mr. Ellis stated his opinion that residents are willing to
pay for the privilege of living in a small community.
Rick Day
stated most of his families activities are centered in GH. He stated
his opinion that investment should be made in the community he “lives
and plays in.”
Anthony
Panzera, GH Council Member, stated MC moving the service contract to
UA would have a deep impact on GH and re-engaging in GH services at
the end of a contract with UA may not be simple if GH has made
staffing adjustments.
Bob
Dvoraczky, GH Finance Director, stated he enjoys working in a small
community with a personal touch. He stated that in a small community
there is positive peer pressure among employees to provide excellent
services. Mr. Dvoracsky stated that losing the MC service contract
would negatively impact both communities because of the significant
financial impact on GH. He also offered his expertise to MC to assist
in budgeting and long range planning.
Rick
Mathias, GH resident, stated his opinion that MC will be a small fish
in a large pond with UA and will not get the attention that it enjoys
now from GH.
Nate
Rosenstein stated the issue is about MC not GH. The relationship with
GH is not based on the service contract but in the schools and the
relationships that grow out of the schools between children and
adults. He stated his opinion that MC faces a serious financial
situation and the Council should make the best financial decision for
MC to ensure that MC has a future.
Mayor
Studebaker thanked all the attendees and speakers. He summarized that
the Village Officials plan to continue to work to address the
financial issues that face the community and make a decision regarding
the service contract.
Mayor
Studebaker invited Mr. Staton and Mayor DeGraw to make any final
comments. Mr. Staton stated MC has received UA’s best efforts in the
submitted proposals and expressed his thanks for the opportunity to
present the proposals and answer questions.
Mayor
DeGraw stated the 5% increase in the service contract over the past
three years was coming off “three 0% increase years” and the increase
over 6 years is not as significant. He also thanked Council for the
opportunity to present their proposal and answer questions.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:55 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 21, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
November 21, 2011 at 1581 Cambridge Blvd. – Trinity Methodist Church -
at 7:00 pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: David. T.
Roark, Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert
W. Sterneker,
and
Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor,
Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, William
Johannes, Administrative Assistant and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay.
Visitors and press were present.
CONSENT AGENDA

Ms.
McKay reported that the October financials include the semi-annual
settlement of estate taxes. Mayor Studebaker reminded Council that
estate taxes have been eliminated by the state and, except for estates
which have not been settled and closed, the Village will not receive
estate taxes in the future.
Mr. Roark moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The Consent Agenda was approved unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported that the parking lot work at 1600 Dublin Rd. will
be completed in the spring. They had planned to complete the parking
lot work, but the weather has brought the work to a halt. He reported
the owners intend to continue planting trees as long as weather
permits.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented a proposal from Nutter Excavation to repair the
sink hole behind 1600 Roxbury Rd. The quote is for $10,000.00. Mr.
McFarland reported the property will be accessed for the repair
through 2015 W. Fifth Ave. The property owner has approved the access
across her property. Ms. Troiano asked if additional funds need to be
approved to evaluate the tree that is close to the sink hole. Mr.
McFarland said the plan is to protect the tree if at all possible.
Mr. Sterneker moved approval of the quotation for $10,000.00 for
Nutter Excavation for repair of the sink hole at 1600 Roxbury Rd. Mr.
Kukura seconded. The motion was approved unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker asked Mr. Banchefsky to explain the process undertaken by
the Village to obtain Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the Village
services contract.
Mr. Banchefsky
summarized the status of the RFP process and the Village’s plan to
resolve the issues that have arisen in order to make a final decision
on the service and solid waste contracts.
Mr.
Banchefsky stated the decision by Grandview Heights to submit a
revised proposal after the RFP deadline has “thrown the process into a
tizzy,” but stated he has a recommendation to resolve issues after
explaining the differences between an RFP and a formal bid.
A formal
bid includes a full contract as part of a bid package which also
includes very detailed specifications and expectations along with a
hard deadline for response. After a submission of a formal bid there
is little or no opportunity to negotiate or revise the specifications
or the responses. Mr. Banchefsky contrasted an RFP as a “polar
opposite” to a formal bid stating that the requesting entity has an
idea of what is needed, but requests an RFP from qualified entities
with expertise in how the needs specified
in the RFP could be delivered. Marble Cliff developed the RFP for
Village services based on the current Grandview Heights Service
Contract and included a specific due date and time for responses.
Typically, following the receipt of RFP’s the requester enters into a
negotiating phase with the entity that is the most responsive.
Mr.
Banchefsky summarized the process to date stating the Village issued
the RFP for Village services with a proposal receipt date of November
10, 2011 at 11:00 am. The RFP included the statement that submissions
received after the due date and time would be marked as late and not
considered. Grandview Heights and Upper Arlington submitted proposals
as required and each were opened and read in public. The UA proposal
was approximately 20% lower than the GH proposal. On Monday November
14, 2011, Grandview Heights Mayor Ray DeGraw delivered a second,
unsolicited proposal directly to Mayor Studebaker’s home. Mr.
Banchefsky stated Mayor DeGraw’s action created significant legal
issues with the RFP process.
Mr.
Banchefsky stated the Village intends to create a fair process and
fully inform the public of the process and the responses. Mr.
Banchefsky offered three options for consideration:
1) Council could
consider only the two proposals initially submitted.
2) Council could
reject the two original proposals and start the process over.
3) Council could
request new proposals from both entities and set a new, final deadline
date and time.
Mr. Banchefsky stated
that the options will be considered by Council. He stated his opinion
that all three are legally supportable albeit the third option is
unusual but legally “doable.”
Mr.
Banchefsky then addressed a question raised previously regarding how a
service contract can address “level of service” issues. He stated the
current GH service contract addresses the issue with a statement that
Marble Cliff will receive the same level of services provided to
Grandview residents. He stated the contract language has been adequate
in the past. However, the contract can be written to include
requirements for response times. The current contract also allows for
cancellation without cause which is another general way to address
“level of service” issues.
Mr.
Sterneker asked for clarification of the negotiation process of an
RFP.
Mr. Banchefsky
explained that typically the negotiation process begins with the
selection of a respondent, however he believes it is supportable to
follow a process such as option three above to begin “negotiations”
before a single respondent is selected.
Mayor
Studebaker presented responses to questions raised at the Town Hall
meeting on November 14, 2011.
A question
was asked regarding how UA would respond to the “man power” needs of
the Village. Mayor Studebaker reported the UA City Manager stated UA
is prepared to do a full analysis of need and to authorize overtime of
city employees in the initial stages of the contract until the need is
fully evaluated and appropriate staffing is in place.
A question
was asked regarding the impact on the GH schools of moving the service
contract from GH to UA. Mayor Studebaker stated there is no direct
correlation between the schools and the service contract. Marble Cliff
residents pay property taxes for Grandview schools and the Grandview
Library. Mayor Studebaker provided information indicating that it is
not unusual for jurisdictional lines for service provision and school
district lines to cross.
Ms. McKay
presented financial information regarding projected general fund
balances. Charts were provided showing the impact of the two RFP
responses on the general fund balance through 2016. Mayor Studebaker
stated the UA response does not include solid waste services. The
financial analysis includes the Rumpke response to the SWACO bid
requests to create an “apples to apples” comparison.
Mr.
Banchefsky explained that Mr. Cincione is contracted by Grandview
Heights as their magistrate. Therefore, based on the recommendation of
the Ohio Ethics Commission he is abstaining from participating in the
Council deliberations and voting on the service contract. Mr.
Cincione’s abstention will require the Council to act with a 4 to 1
vote.
Mayor
Studebaker reported GH has stated their willingness to continue to
provide services beyond the end of the current service contract
(12/31/2011) to ensure that Village services are not interrupted.
Mary Hayes
asked about removing the $47,000 of Parks and Recreations fees from
the contract. Mayor Studebaker stated that GH has been made aware of
the Village’s position that it is very difficult to justify the Parks
and Recreation cost in GH’s proposal, but GH has insisted that the
proposal is all inclusive and has not been willing to remove the Parks
and Recreation cost.
Ralph
Talmage stated that he believes there cannot be an “apples to apples”
comparison when the UA police are stationed so far from the Village.
He stated his opinion that the GH service quality will not be matched
and that MC would be “abusing GH by moving the service contract.” He
stated that the communities are tied by our children’s sports teams,
school affiliation, the Memorial Day parade, and Lazy Days. Mr.
Talmage stated that UA will probably not provide police services for
those joint GH and MC activities that MC benefits from. He stated GH
picks up the trash for the schools and if MC changes service providers
the schools would have to obtain another entity to collect their
trash.
John
Hoberg stated that their homes are in Marble Cliff but access to their
property is from the GH end of Bluff Ave. He stated his pleasure with
the quality of GH services and personnel. He stated his concern that
in an emergency UA would not be able to find their homes. He stated
his opinion that Marble Cliff will be an “appendage” to UA and their
property will be an appendage to the appendage. He stated his concern
that snow removal will be an issue if UA is the service provider and
he and his neighbors will be trapped by a significant snowfall. Mr.
Hoberg stated his opinion that the community of MC and GH will be
weakened if the service contract is moved to UA. He asked that MC not
only maintain its service contract with GH but commit to the
relationship permanently.
Tom Miller
stated that MC won’t be treated as well by UA as we are by GH.
Dale
Johnson stated that he recognizes quality throughout MC and stated
that he believes GH’s provides the level of quality services expected
by the Village.
Mayor
Studebaker reminded those present that concerns about level or quality
of service provided by GH did not precipitate the undertaking of the
RFP process; the Village officials are in complete agreement that the
quality of services provided by GH is excellent. The issue is the cost
of the services and the way MC is spending its money in a time of
decreasing revenue and increasing costs. The RFP responses showed a
potentially significant saving for the Village. The Village Council is
tasked with gathering such information and making responsible and
informed decisions for the Village.
Tom Miller
asked what options the Village would have when it is broke. Mr. Roark
stated the Village will do something, either increase taxes to
increase revenue or the Village could merge with GH. Mayor Studebaker
stated the Village is working very hard to attract new business and to
assist commercial property owners to fully utilize their properties.
Mayor Studebaker pointed to the recent annexation attempt between the
City of Worthington and the Village of Riverlea as an example of how
two communities might or might not merge. He stated it is the
prerogative of any resident to pursue annexation.
Council
discussed the assumptions made in the five year projection. Mr. Kukura
suggested that the revenue projections do not accurately reflect
annual salary increases that will be part of taxable income in the
future.
Mr. Hoberg
asked if the Village’s current annual deficit is approximately
$200,000 and asked for confirmation that the UA proposal would cut
that annual deficit to approximately $100,000. Mayor Studebaker
confirmed the assumption.
Mary Hayes
stated she goes through UA on a regular basis and rarely sees a police
cruiser. She stated a police presence deters crime and believes she
will never see an UA cruiser on Village Court. She stated that UA is
large and has areas that need to be patrolled and consequently UA
cruisers rarely patrol south of Lane Ave.
Lynda
Murray asked for copies of the proposals. Rich Murray asked if the
subsequent letter from Mayor DeGraw is a public record. Mayor
Studebaker stated it is a public record and is available. Rich Murray
asked what for the amount of change between GH’s two proposals. Mayor
Studebaker stated the difference between the two GH proposals is
approximately $30,000 each year.
Anne Jewel
thanked Council for their efforts and agrees that GH provides
excellent services. She stated that she is very concerned about the
cost of the services particularly as reflected in GH’s first proposal.
Ken Frick
stated his concern that the Village is spending $200,000 more than its
annual revenue and the current rate of overspending will make the
Village “ripe” for annexation. UA’s proposal will save money. He
stated his opinion that the Village must stretch their budget and,
although Grandview faces financial challenges, it is not the Village’s
responsibility to fix their problems. Ken Frick stated his opinion
that if MC accepts this GH proposal in three years GH will not
negotiate and the Village will have nowhere else to turn. He suggested
that the Village give UA a chance and direct our own future.
Council
and residents discussed the Parks and Recreation aspect of the GH’s
proposal.
Ms.
Troiano summarized the three Council options outlined by Mr.
Banchefsky. She recommended that Council take option three of
requesting new proposals from both entities setting a new, final
deadline. Mr. Roark concurred with Ms. Troiano’s recommendation.
Ms. Troiano moved that Grandview Heights and
Upper Arlington be asked submit a final RFP by 11:00 AM on December 5,
2011. Mr. Roark seconded the motion. The motion passed 5 in favor, 1
opposed with 1 abstention.
Mayor
Studebaker stated the evening’s discussion will stand as the first
reading of O-2316-11, An Ordinance adopting a contract for Police,
Emergency Medical and Fire Prevention and Suppression
Services, Recreational Facilities, Solid Waste Collection,
Maintenance Services, and Other Public Services with the City of
________________, Ohio, and directing the Mayor to sign the
contract. No action was taken
Mayor
Studebaker stated the evening’s discussion will stand as the first
reading of O-2317-11, An Ordinance adopting a contract for Solid Waste
Collection with ______________________, and directing the Mayor to
sign the contract. No action was taken
Mr. McFarland left the meeting at this point.
VISITORS – Cont.
GH Police
Chief reported that a GH police officer stopped a suspicious truck on
Arlington Ave. The driver had over 20 outstanding warrants in
Delaware. Another truck fled the scene and was stopped by GH police on
Fifth Ave. The two detained individuals are suspected in multiple
thefts in Delaware.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr. Johannes had no
report for Council.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Ms. Troiano moved
approval of the November 2011 bills totaling $222,446.38. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Roark moved
approval of the amended October 2011 bills totaling $64,155.21. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay had no
report for Council.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2314-11, 2012 ANNUAL
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE. Council asked questions regarding the
supporting budgeting reports. Ms. McKay encouraged Council to contact
her with additional questions before the next meeting.
Ms.
Troiano reported she will be purchasing supplies and materials for the
holiday party. Catering and poinsettias are ordered and arrangements
are underway to hire a photographer. Ms. McKay reported the
invitations will be mailed on November 23, 2011. In place of
collecting gifts for Fire Fighters for Kids, adults and children will
be invited to participate in a project to provide blankets for the
homeless shelter.
Ms. Siefkas reported
the community group interested in riverfront access for a kayak/canoe
“putin” is continuing to meet. She stated she may have an more
detailed report for the December Council meeting.
NEW BUSINESS – Cont.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2318-11, An Ordinance
authorizing an agreement with Charles Kelsey to provide Mayor’s Court
Magistrate Services for a one-year period from January 1, 2012 Through
December 31, 2012.
Ms. Troiano moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Roark
seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Troiano moved the
adoption of O-2318-11. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2319-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Mayor and Fiscal Officer to enter into a contract for
Professional Legal Services with Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn, LPA for a
one-year period from February 1, 2012 through January 31, 2013. Ms.
Troiano abstained from discussion and vote a citing conflict of
interest. Mr. Banchefsky stated there were no changes from the prior
contract.
Mr. Sterneker moved the rules be suspended. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The
motion passed unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of
O-2319-11. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion passed 5 in favor and one
abstention.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2320-11, An Ordinance
providing for additional legal counsel for the Village of Marble
Cliff, Ohio, authorizing the employment of assistants in connection
with the prosecution of criminal and traffic cases in the Municipal
Court of Franklin County, Ohio, setting compensation of said
assistants, and authorizing the Mayor to enter into a contract with
the City Attorney of Columbus, Ohio, to accomplish such purposes.
Ms. McKay
explained the changes from the prior contract in fee calculations in
the proposed contract. Council discussed options, but took no action.
Ms. McKay
reported the Village received a notice from the state’s Department of
Liquor Control outlining the Village’s options for opposing the
reissuance of a permit to sell alcohol at the Certified Oil Company on
Dublin Rd. in the Village. Council agreed not to oppose reissuing of
the permit.
Mr.
Johannes reported the Village Hall would be closed on Thanksgiving Day
(Nov.24th) and the Friday after Thanksgiving.
Mr.
Sterneker reported he will be working with a crew of residents to put
up the holiday lights on Friday, November 25th.
Council
determined there will be a special Council meeting at 7:00 pm on
Wednesday, December 14, 2011 to receive final proposals for Village
services from Upper Arlington and Grandview Heights. Council asked
that representatives from UA and GH be invited to attend.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 9:15 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 2011
A special meeting of
the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday, November
14, 2011 in the Grandview Heights Public Library at 1685 W. First Ave.
at 7:00 pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T.
Roark, Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, and
Robert W. Sterneker; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor,
Mitchell Banchefsky, William Johannes and Fiscal Officer
Cynthia McKay. Approximately 40 visitors and press were present.
Mr. Kukura moved Ms. Troiano be excused. Mr. Cincione seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
TOWN HALL MEETING
Mayor
Studebaker welcomed those assembled for the special Council meeting
and Town Hall meeting. He explained the purpose of the meeting: to
share information with residents regarding the Village’s process for
choosing a Village services provider and to receive resident input on
the options presented. Mayor Studebaker reminded those present that in
November 2010, Village Officials shared Village financial information
with residents and presented options for increasing revenue and
decreasing expenses to balance the Village’s annual budget and extend
the Village’s financial solvency. At that meeting residents encouraged
Village Officials to consider ways to reduce expenses. As the current
contract expires on 12/31/2011 and it is the largest single annual
expense Council began investigating options for the provision of the
services early in 2011.
Fiscal
Officer McKay presented an update of the five year financial
projections for the Village. She explained that the changes the
Village has made over the last year have extended a positive balance
in the General Fund from the beginning of 2015 through 2016. Ms. McKay
explained the Village has adopted universal income tax filing and
increased the inside millage property tax both of which will be in
effect for calendar year 2012. She also reported that the Village
refinanced the General Services (“park”) Bond to save approximately
$83,000 in interest over the next ten years. Ms. McKay reviewed the
projected revenue and expenditures for 2012. Ms. McKay answered
questions from the audience.
Mayor
Studebaker explained the Village’s position is to maintain the 2%
income tax rate as a tool to draw businesses into Marble Cliff without
offering extensive tax incentives.
Mayor
Studebaker explained the Village’s process to obtain proposals to
provide Village services including police, fire, EMS, building and
zoning and solid waste disposal. The Solid Waste Authority of
Central Ohio (SWACO) made resources available to the Village to assist
in obtaining quotes to provide trash collection, recycling and yard
waste collection. Working with SWACO bid specifications were issued
and the Village received three responses from private waste collection
providers. The bid specs did not limit responses to private haulers;
however no municipalities chose to submit a bid.
Council
decided to look at the possibility of having services provided by
other municipalities. Along with Grandview Heights, the Village
investigated the possibility of receiving proposals from the City of
Columbus and several surrounding townships. In the end, only Grandview
Heights and Upper Arlington responded to the Request for Proposal
(RFP). Mayor Studebaker shared the responses from the two
submissions. Upper Arlington did not provide a cost for solid waste
collection because they currently contract with a private hauler.
Upper Arlington also included parks and recreations services as part
of the base proposal. In order to provide an “apples to apples”
comparison between the two proposals, the proposal from Rumpke
obtained through the SWACO process was added to the Upper Arlington
proposal. (See the chart inserted below summarizing the RFP
responses received from Grandview Heights and Upper Arlington.)
The Village estimates that in addition to the base service contract
fees, it incurs approximately $25,000 annually in “billable services”
not included in the base service contract fees. Rumpke was chosen to
represent the solid waste contractor because the bid specification
requested services to match current services. Rumpke’s quote was the
closest to providing services as currently provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost |
|
|
2012 |
2013 |
%
increase |
2014 |
%
increase |
|
3
Yr Total |
|
Grandview Service w/Refuse |
$ 524,310.00 |
$ 541,260.00 |
3.13% |
$ 558,795.00 |
3.14% |
|
$ 1,624,365.00 |
|
Grandview Service w/o Refuse |
$ 459,335.00 |
$ 474,165.00 |
3.13% |
$ 489,510.00 |
3.13% |
|
$ 1,423,010.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upper Arlington w/o Refuse |
$ 370,728.00 |
$ 382,999.00 |
3.20% |
$ 395,676.00 |
3.20% |
|
$ 1,149,403.00 |
|
Rumpke - Refuse Only |
$ 62,304.00 |
$ 62,304.00 |
0.00% |
$ 62,304.00 |
0.00% |
|
$ 186,912.00 |
|
Total Arlington/Refuse |
$ 433,032.00 |
$ 445,303.00 |
2.76% |
$ 457,980.00 |
2.77% |
|
$ 1,336,315.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Differences: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Refuse |
$ 91,278.00 |
$ 95,957.00 |
|
$ 100,815.00 |
|
|
$ 288,050.00 |
|
Without Refuse |
$ 88,607.00 |
$ 91,166.00 |
|
$ 93,834.00 |
|
|
$ 273,607.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extra Services are not included. Prior experience is approx.
$25,000 per year. |
|
|
|
Mayor
Studebaker reported the Grandview Heights proposal for 2012
represented approximately a 6% increase over the 2011 service
contract. In addition Snow plowing is included at no additional cost
by Upper Arlington and as a billable for Grandview Heights. In prior
years snow removal costs to the Village have been between $15,000 and
$17,000 in “billable services” each year. A resident asked if the
Village could anticipate the same level of police and fire services as
currently provided given the much lower cost provided in the RFP.
Mayor Studebaker explained the level of service requirements have been
made clear to Upper Arlington and, based on conversations and review
of fire and EMS runs to the Village from the surrounding communities
the Village is confident that UA would provide service at the same
level as GH.
Questions
were asked about swimming pool and parks and recreation options. Mayor
Studebaker explained that currently everyone has the opportunity to
participate in both Grandview and Arlington parks and recreation
services. The difference is whether that participation is at
“resident” or “non-resident” rates.
Mayor
Studebaker directed attention to a Question and Answer sheet that was
made available to residents along with the invitation to the meeting
tonight. He explained that the service contract has no bearing on the
school district. Marble Cliff is part of the Grandview Heights School
District as well as the Grandview Heights Library District and a
change in Village service provision would not alter those
relationships. Marble Cliff property taxes support both the school and
the library. Mayor Studebaker reminded the audience that property
taxes collected by the Village are a very small portion of the total
property taxes paid by property owners in the Village.
Mayor Studebaker
opened the floor for questions and comments.
Mary Hayes expressed
her concern that Upper Arlington’s growth will not allow them to
provide police and fire services at the same level as Grandview
Heights.
Ken Ellis asked how
much longer the UA proposal would allow MC to be financially sound and
what happens when the Village is no longer financially sound. Mayor
Studebaker explained the savings – if nothing else changes – to the
Village will be $100,000 per year and extend financial viability for
several years. If the Village were unable to operate financially as a
separate municipality, the option would be to merge or be annexed by
another community.
A resident asked if
the Council has considered approaching our property tax exempt
properties and asking them to provide funds. Mayor Studebaker stated
that such an option has not been considered, but the Council could
consider it.
Ken Frick stated that
the UA fire and EMS respond quickly to the apartments on Roxbury Rd.
often arriving ahead of GH. Mayor Studebaker explained that mutual aid
agreements are in place for fire/EMS giving regional coverage to the
area. Police services are more likely to remain within jurisdiction.
He explained that GH has reviewed the amount of time spent in MC and
determined that its officers may be spending more time in MC as
compared to the rest of their jurisdiction.
Mary Lou McGregor
asked if UA plans to add police cars to cover MC. She stated she
rarely sees UA police in the area. She also stated her opinion that MC
should consider the impact of moving the service contract to UA
knowing that MC’s property values are linked to the health of the
Grandview community. Mayor Studebaker stated UA has indicated that its
police manpower is adequate to provide services to MC. Mayor
Studebaker stated that GH will have a loss of approximately $500,000
to its revenue if the service contract is not renewed.
Dave Ryan stated he
has lived in both UA and MC and believes the services in MC are
superior. He supported Mary Hayes position. He stated his opinion that
the UA proposal is a “low ball” and they will not be able to provide
the expected services. He asked who would provide trash services.
Mayor Studebaker stated Rumpke was provided as an example for
comparison. Mayor Studebaker asked Mayor DeGraw if Grandview would
consider offering solid waste collection only and Mayor DeGraw
indicated that Grandview would not consider breaking out services;
their proposal stands as an “all or nothing” offer. Mayor Studebaker
explained that the Village requested that all solid waste be picked up
on the same day at a single point either at the street or at the
garage as determined by each household.
A resident asked what
the parks and recreation fee of $46,000 is for and why we would have
to pay it. Mayor Studebaker explained that GH included the cost
despite the Village’s position that it is a cost which is very
difficult to justify to MC residents. Despite requests from the
Village to remove the parks and recreation cost from the contract, GH
has not been willing to remove the cost. GH contends that it is MC’s
share of park maintenance and improvement, the differential between
“resident” and “non-resident” costs and the Village’s share of the
parks and recreation facilities used by the Grandview schools such as
the playground at Pierce Field and the tennis courts. Residents
suggested that the Village’s own costs of green space maintenance
should be considered by GH because they use and enjoy our facilities.
Mayor Studebaker stated Mayor DeGraw has indicated they have already
given a $25,000 credit to the Village in their calculations.
Kent Thompson asked if
selling Tarpy Woods would reconcile the budget. Ms. McKay explained
that the bond repayment is transferred from the General Fund.
Residents expressed their opposition to selling or developing Tarpy
Woods.
Stephanie Brett asked
if there is room to negotiate. Mayor Studebaker explained the RFP
process assumed each community would provide their best proposal by
the stated RFP deadline. Mayor Studebaker stated that well after the
deadline one of the communities provided a revised proposal which has
not been reviewed at this point. Tonight the Village is sharing the
RFP proposals received through the designated process. The Village
will discuss negotiation options with legal counsel.
Joan Klitch stated
that 15 years ago the Village went through a similar process and at
that time received a lower bid from UA which was dismissed. She stated
her opinion that if the Village repeats that action, it is unlikely
that any time within the next fifteen years we will be able to
approach UA again. Then Grandview can do anything it wants. She
reported historically the Village has unsuccessfully fought the parks
and recreation fee allowing the base contract amount to grow and
expand the impact of 3% and 5% increases each year. Mayor Studebaker
reported the three year contract currently expiring had a 5% increase
every year.
Gavin Larrimar stated
he has lived in UA as do family members and their trash pick-up is
“terrible.” He suggested that if MC chooses UA that we not pick the
private trash hauler currently providing services to UA. Mayor
Studebaker stated none of the three bidders for our contract currently
provide services to UA.
A resident asked how
the Village will gauge whether level of service expectations are met
and what recourse the Village will have if the level of services does
not meet expectation. How will Council decide whether to choose based
on lower cost or on what the residents prefer and how will the Council
make a decision within a short time frame as outlined? Mayor
Studebaker commented that the Village Officials have been receiving
comments and suggestions outside of this meeting, but only just
received actual numbers to consider. He acknowledged the time line is
short, but also stated that GH has assured MC that they will continue
to provide services beyond the contract period to allow time for a
decision to be made. He stated his opinion that the Council is still
very much engaged in the process and considering all options and
opinions. Mayor Studebaker stated that performance expectations would
be included in the contract language with consequences for failure to
perform.
Rich Murray stated his
opinion that UA is at an advantage because they knew GH’s contract
amount before submitting their proposal. He also supported Mary Lou
McGregor’s opinion that the schools are the “crown jewel” of the both
communities and anything that would weaken the school would be bad for
both communities. He also stated his opinion that the time table for
making a decision is too short.
Jeff Smith stated that
moving the contract would have a damaging effect on GH’s financial
health. He asked about the tax implications if MC were merged with GH.
Mayor Studebaker if MC were merged with GH our property tax rate would
go from 1 mill to 10.6 mills and income tax would go from 2% to 2.5%.
Marble Cliff has an income tax base of approximately $40,000,000 which
would pass to GH to be taxed at their higher rate which would
significantly benefit GH. GH would also take over infrastructure
maintenance. Mayor Studebaker stated GH is currently operating at a
deficit, but is anticipating increased revenue through Grandview Yard.
Ken Frick asked why
residents would anticipate that UA would not provide the same level of
services. He also stated that, despite being aware of MC’s ongoing
annual financial deficit, GH considers its best offer to be a 6%
increase.
Dave
Ryan expressed his surprise that GH is willing to lose the entire
contract over $46,000 in parks and recreation costs. Mayor Studebaker
encouraged Mr. Ryan to express his thoughts to Mayor DeGraw. At one
point there was a joint park board made up of GH, MC and the Grandview
Schools to determine community needs and costs. Joan Klitch shared her
memory that a member of Grandview’s Council suggested the board might
not be a legal entity and it was dissolved.
Ken Ellis stated he
would not welcome the demise of a 60 year relationship with GH and
suggested that a property tax increase be considered. He also
suggested that overtime charges for snow removal, etc should be
carefully monitored.
Susan Studebaker asked
how residents should continue to share thoughts and questions. Mayor
Studebaker suggested email is the best way to communicate and
encouraged residents to give suggestions and specifics to Council.
Matt Cincione
suggested that the next regular Council meeting be moved to a larger
venue. Ms. McKay stated she would investigate locations and the
community will be notified through the agenda and the blast email.
ADJOURN
The Town Hall Meeting
was closed and Council meeting was adjourned by Mayor Studebaker at
8:25 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T. Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF OCTOBER 17, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
October 17, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00
pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: Matthew A. Cincione,
John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and Kendy A.
Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor, Mitchell
Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, and Fiscal Officer,
Cynthia McKay. Visitors were present. Mr. Cincione moved Mr.
Roark be excused. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
VARIANCES AND PERMITS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2311-11, An Ordinance
granting a Fence Variance to Phil Shively for the property at 1466
Cambridge Blvd. in the Village of Marble Cliff and declaring an
emergency. Mr. Shively explained his plans to extend an
existing fence across the east property line. The fence would be the
same style and height as the existing fence. Ms. McKay reported the
Village Hall received two letters in support of the variance request
and no contacts expressing opposition to the variance.
Mr. Sterneker moved
the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of O-2311-11. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Kukura moved the
ordinance be adopted as emergency legislation to allow construction to
begin during the current construction season. Ms. Troiano seconded.
Roll call: Mr. Cincione, yes; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms. Siefkas, yes; Mr.
Sterneker, yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2313-11, An Ordinance
approving a Use Variance to Thomas Miller for the property at 2109
West Fifth Ave., in the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Miller
provided information on commercial rental space, similar in size to
the property at 2109 W. Fifth Ave., currently available in northwest
Columbus. Mr. Miller explained his opinion that the property may be
more easily marketed as a combination “live/work” mixed use space. He
stated his opinion that the concept will gain support and there may be
additional requests for modified zoning. Mayor Studebaker stated that
Council will be considering another request similar to Mr. Miller’s
and may decide to review the Village’s current Central Business
District zoning in the near future.
Council
asked questions regarding necessary renovations and possible future
changes. Mr. Miller stated the lower level units would not accommodate
live/work space and will remain commercial space. Therefore units A,
B, C, and D are the only units in the building that can be used as
live/work space. Mr. Miller expressed his interest in being part of
any future rezoning discussions. Mayor Studebaker stated property
owners will be notified if Council plans to consider zoning changes.Mr.
Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion
passed unanimously. Mr. Kukura moved the adoption of O-2313-11. Mr.
Sterneker seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2312-11, An
Ordinance approving a use variance to Kathryn G. Gardner for the
property at 2015 West Fifth Ave., in the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mayor Studebaker introduced Dr. Gardner. She told Council
she is working to identify potential tenants and is also working to
determine how the building might be subdivided to accommodate
live/work tenants. She stated her intention to finalize plans as
tenants are identified.
Ms.
Siefkas asked how the variance will impact future property owners or
tenants holding leases at a time when the property might be sold. Mr.
Banchefsky explained that as the variance is proposed a new property
owner would need to receive Council approval to continue the use
variance. The goal is to help market the property while protecting the
Village’s commercial zoning district. Ms. Siefkas asked if the Village
would limit the number of units that could be housed in the building
while protecting the historical integrity of the building. Ms. Troiano
asked how personal and business taxes would be identified at the
property in question. Mayor Studebaker stated taxes would be handled
as the Village handles “home businesses” which are allowed anywhere in
the Village.
Ms. McKay
noted that current code defines what must be included in a living
space to qualify as “residential living unit” and those requirements
effectively limit the number of live/work units that could be created
under current code within the building. Ms. Siefkas stated her opinion
that in the current economic environment it is in the Village’s
interest to create opportunities for success. Mr. Kukura agreed with
Ms. Siefkas’ opinion.
Ms. McKay
reported that the no letters or telephone calls either in favor or
opposition to the
variance request were received at
Village Hall.
Mr. Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Kukura seconded. The
motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of
O-2312-11. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr.
Kukura moved approval of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Cincione seconded.
The Consent Agenda was approved unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported that the parking lot expansion at 1600 Dublin Rd.
has begun along with additional tree planting.
Mayor Studebaker reported he attended the ribbon cutting at The Oilery
on Grandview Ave. He reported he is beginning to work more with the
Grandview Area Chamber of Commerce as his schedule allows.
Mayor
Studebaker reported he is scheduled to attend a meeting at MORPC to
discuss state budget provisions for municipalities that are
investigating or moving toward shared services. He stated there is
grant money available for shared services projects.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the Request for Proposal for the Village Services
Contract was delivered to both Grandview Heights and Upper Arlington
on October 14, 2011. The deadline for submission of the response to
the RFP is November 10, 2011.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the new leaf collection service provider began
leaf pick-up today. He asked Council to report any resident feedback
they receive.
Mayor
Studebaker presented a question and answer sheet regarding the new
service contract selection process for Council to review. The purpose
is to have answers for residential questions regarding the selection
process. Council made several suggestions for additions and changes to
the Q&A. Council discussed concerns raised including some residential
feedback regarding the service contract. Mayor Studebaker stated the
document would be revised and made available to Council and to
residents. It will be posted on the web site.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland reported a sink hole has developed in the ravine behind 1600
Roxbury Rd. Mr. McFarland stated the sink hole has been investigated
and dye tested to determine if there is any damage or infiltration of
the new sanitary sewer line. The sink hole appears to be related to
deterioration of the old, abandoned sanitary sewer line and laterals.
Mr. McFarland has
asked Nutter Excavating to provide an estimate for excavation and
repair of the problems which are causing the sink hole. The Engineer
will bring a quote for the repair work to a future Council meeting.
Mr.
McFarland reported he has received a revised parking lot plan for 1600
Dublin Rd. The plans will be reviewed and Mr. McFarland believes he
will be able to approve them in the very near future.
Mr.
McFarland explained to Council that in reviewing the plans it came to
his attention that the Village storm sewer line under Dublin Rd. at
1600 Dublin Road line is too small and the Village would benefit from
replacing the line. Problems with the line were indicated two years
ago when a sink hole developed in the western, southbound land of
Route 33. The line was cleaned and a point repair was completed at
that time. Replacement of the line was not included in the 2010 Dublin
Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Project. However, because the bid for
the project came in well below the Engineer’s estimate, Mr. McFarland
suggested the Village investigate adding the upgrade from a 12
inch storm
sewer pipe to a 21 inch storm sewer pipe to the 2010 Dublin Road Storm
Sewer Rehabilitation Project. Council suggested the cost of the
additional work be estimated and the option of including it in the
current project be investigated further.
Mr. McFarland will
report back to Council.
Mr.
McFarland reported the Arlington Ave. crack fill and slurry seal
project is complete.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Ms. McKay
presented a report from Mr. Johannes for tree lawn tree replacements
in the Village. Two quotes, one from Davey Tree and one from
Structural Gardens, were summarized in Mr. Johannes’ report and his
recommendation that the Council accept the proposal from Davey Tree.
She confirmed that money has been previously appropriated for the
project. Mayor Studebaker reported the tree to be replaced at 1492
Roxbury has been upgraded from a 3” caliper to a 5” caliper and Mr.
and Mrs. Studebaker intend to pay the difference in the cost for the
more mature tree.
Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the proposal from Davey Tree for up to $2,700.00 for
replacement of Village tree lawn trees. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the October 2011 bills totaling $63,201.05. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the amended September 2011 bills totaling $88,310.99. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented a
supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation:
$10.00 from
1000-710-225-0000 to 1000-710-213-0002 for Medicare/Village Match.
$500.00
from 1000-390-690-0000 to 1000-715-325-0000 for Advertising.
$3,000.00 from 1000-760-344-0000 to 1000-755-344-0000 for Income Tax
Admin.
Mr. Cincione seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2314-11, 2012 ANNUAL
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE.
Ms. McKay asked for input from Council. No action was
taken.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2315-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the expenditure of $3,500.00 for the 2011 Village Holiday
Party and $500.00 for Holiday Decoration of the Village green spaces.
Ms. McKay
reported the figures are the same as those approved for 2010.
Mr. Sterneker stated
he believed the amount identified for decorations will be adequate.
Ms.
Troiano reported she investigated the cost of providing a full meal.
After collecting preliminary quotes the costs are higher than she
recommends and suggested instead that the food be limited to dessert
and punch and coffee. She also suggested the start time be changed to
7:00 pm to allow for residents to have dinner before the party. Ms.
Troiano stated that with that change the amount included in the
ordinance will be more than adequate to cover the costs of the event.
Ms. Troiano will continue her work to organize the party.
Mr. Sterneker moved
the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of O-2315-11. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Ms.
Siefkas expressed her interest in developing additional amenities for
the Village including those that would involve Scioto River access.
Ms. Siefkas also reported that she has received expression of similar
interest for a canoe and kayak “put in” from Marble Cliff residents
and members of the “Friends of the Olentangy River” and the “Friends
of the Scioto River.” Ms. Siefkas reported she and Anne Jewel have
identified the Village property along the river north of the Certified
Gas station as a possible location for the “put in.”
Ms.
Siefkas and Ms. Jewel have contacted the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources to discuss the possibility of receiving an ODNR grant for
the planning and building of a canoe and kayak “put-in.” The ODNR
representative stated the location appeared to be “promising.” In
order to receive the grant, the location must provide a minimum of six
parking places and a gravel pathway to the river. She commented that a
“put-in” location in Marble Cliff would be the only river access point
between Griggs Reservoir and downtown Columbus.
A group of
interested individuals met on October 11th to discuss the
possible project and plan to meet again. Ms. Siefkas attended the
meeting to gather information. She asked for a sense from Council
whether there is interest in continuing the information gathering and
planning. Mayor Studebaker asked when the money would be available
from ODNR. Ms. Siefkas stated ODNR would review applications in April
and would make decisions based on the amount of money available and
the number of applications. The grant can include funds for the
parking area, signage and access. Ms. Siefkas stated her belief that
there is room for six parking spaces, but there are concerns about an
additional curb cut on Route 33. The group investigating the options
might suggest approaching Certified Oil to share their existing curb
cut. ADA requirements do not apply to canoe/kayak “put ins.” The
municipality is obligated to maintain the site for 25 years.
Council
discussed the benefits, challenges and concerns about the project.
Mr. Kukura stated his
opinion that it is worthwhile to continue investigating the project
and the grant from ODNR. Council concurred with Mr. Kukura.
ADJOURN
Mr. Kukura moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 9:00 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPT. 19, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
September 19, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00
pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark,
Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W.
Sterneker, and Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village
Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland,
Administrative Assistant, William Johannes, and Fiscal Officer,
Cynthia McKay. Visitors were present.
VARIANCES AND PERMITS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2307-11, An Ordinance
Granting a Front Yard Setback variance to Jon and Pamela Browning for
1271 Arlington Ave., in the Village of Marble Cliff and Declaring an
Emergency.
Scott
Cole, contractor for the project, explained the plans to convert the
existing garage to living space, add a roof to the front porch and add
a detached garage in the southwest corner of the property. He
explained that the existing home encroaches into the front yard
setback and, because of the shape of the lot and the setbacks
established by code the new garage would encroach as well. The new
garage is to be placed approximately 10 feet off the west property
line to accommodate an AEP easement. The proposed additions do not
violate the Village’s lot coverage requirements. Ms. McKay reported
that the office received one letter and one telephone call in support
of the project and no letters or phone calls in opposition. Council
discussed the plan and asked questions of Mr. Cole and Mr. and Mrs.
Browning.
Mr. Cincione moved the
rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of O-2307-11. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the
ordinance be adopted as emergency legislation to allow construction to
begin during the current construction season. Ms. Troiano seconded.
Roll call: Mr. Roark, yes; Mr. Cincione, yes; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms.
Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker, yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed
unanimously.
VISITORS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced Dr. Kathryn Gardner, owner of 2015 W. Fifth
Ave., to present an idea to modify the use of the building at 2015 W.
Fifth Ave. Dr. Gardner explained that in the current economic climate
she has had a great deal of difficulty renting the property and
maintaining the current tenants. She stated her desire to maintain the
original style of the building, but explained the challenges of using
a building built as a home as commercial office space. Dr. Gardner
stated she would like to be allowed to offer space within the building
as “live/work” space where tenants could maintain both their home and
their offices. She reported she has been contacted by several
potential renters who would like to have their home and their work
space at the same location. The building addition on the rear of the
building would remain commercial. Dr. Gardner described the interior
of the building and shared her thoughts on how the space could be
divided to accommodate both residential and office space. She stated
that most of the original architectural detail is still in the
building. She reported several upgrades have been made to the
building, but there are upgrades that must still be done.
Clayton
Davis, realtor for the property, reiterated the challenge of leasing
the space in the current economic conditions. He stated there has been
interest in the live/work arrangement. Mayor Studebaker asked if the
live/work trend has caught on in the Columbus area. Mr. Davis stated
he believes it is not yet prevalent in the area. He stated there is
some discussion among developers and some new building supporting
mixed use has been constructed. Mr. Roark asked how many businesses
could be placed in the building. Dr. Gardner described the previous
tenants and usage. The back building can house six business tenants.
There is one current tenant in the front. There are sixteen rooms in
the front building that could be used, but the preference would be for
one or two larger tenants to occupy the front building. Mayor
Studebaker shared the Village’s concern that the live/work use would
reduce the potential of the building to produce income tax for the
Village.
Mr. Roark
expressed his desire that there be a mechanism by which, if a use
variance or conditional use permit is issued for the building allowing
for residential and commercial use, the building would revert to
commercial only upon change of tenants or ownership. Ms. Siefkas
expressed her opinion that there is a real opportunity to market the
building in a way that would be advantageous for the community and the
property owner. Mr. Cincione stated his opinion that the Village
should look seriously at the options and suggested that the W. Fifth
Ave. corridor might need a new zoning classification to accommodate
the changing market. Council discussed options for protecting the
historical portion of the building from demolition and preservation of
the historical architectural integrity of the property. No action was
taken by Council
Mayor
Studebaker introduced Grandview Heights Police Chief Wood to provide
an update on police activity related recent break-ins and car thefts
in the Village. Chief Wood summarized recent efforts to identify
suspects and make arrests. Upper Arlington Police identified a suspect
through fingerprinting. The suspect has also been linked to Marble
Cliff break-ins and two bank robberies including one on First Ave. in
Grandview Heights. Chief Wood then explained what steps are being
taken to apprehend the suspect. Chief Wood encouraged Council and
staff to let residents know that they should call the police to report
any suspicious activity.
Mayor
Studebaker asked Ms. Troiano to update Council on the recent Block
Watch meeting. Ms. Troiano reported 36 residents attended the meeting
along with the Mayor, Chief Wood and Detective Harper. Ms. Troiano
delivered flyers to homes and knocked on doors at apartments
personally inviting residents to attend. She reported there was good
information distributed at the meeting and the residents were
receptive to the information and instructions provided. Ms. Troiano
reported she has had some residents express a willingness to become
“Block Captains.”
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the Consent Agenda. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The Consent
Agenda was approved unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he met with Robert Meyers, representing Riverside
Ten LLC. He stated that expansion and maintenance of the parking lot
at 1600 Dublin Rd. is moving forward. Engineers have met with Louis
McFarland to review plans for the parking lot expansion. Tree planting
along Dublin Rd. is underway.
Mr. Meyers
reported that an additional 80-90 new employees should occupy the
building by January 1, 2012. He also stated he believes by January 1,
2012 he should have commitments for leases on the balance of the space
with occupancy by mid-year 2012. Mayor Studebaker said Mr. Meyers
invited Council to tour the building. Council expressed interest in
touring the building. Mayor Studebaker said he would pursue
arrangements to tour the building.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented the revised and updated zoning map for Council
consideration.
Ms. Troiano moved
approval of the revised and updated zoning map. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2308-11, An Ordinance
accepting a bid for the 2011 Dublin Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation
and waiving any bid irregularities.
Mr.
McFarland distributed the bid tabulation of the bids received. He
recommended the Village accept the bid from Nutter Excavating.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Sterneker seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of O-2308-11. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr.
Banchefsky asked Mayor Studebaker to review with Council the
activities to date related to securing an agreement for receiving
Village recyclables and for solid waste collection. Mayor Studebaker
explained the first part of the process is complete and the Village
now has an agreement with Rumpke to receive Village recyclables at no
charge. Mayor Studebaker explained he and staff are working with SWACO
to develop a solid waste collection bid similar to the collection
service currently provided including “carry out” service at the garage
for trash pick-up. The Village is not bound by the bids received and
can decline any and all bids received. The history suggests working
through a SWACO coalition can lower solid waste costs.
Mayor
Studebaker reported Upper Arlington has expressed interest in bidding
on Village services. Upper Arlington suggested that the services could
be provided at cost lower than the Village is currently paying.
Ms.
Siefkas reported a resident has informed her that she prefers the
service received from Grandview Heights. Ms. Siefkas suggested that
the Village hold a public meeting to share with residents the level of
service being sought and the cost information. Mayor Studebaker
encouraged Council to ask residents to submit comments in writing
outlining the aspects of Grandview’s service that they particularly
appreciate and specific concerns about other possible providers of
service. Mayor Studebaker reported Upper Arlington is currently
providing some safety services for some of the surrounding townships.
Mr. Kukura
asked if a change in the service contract to UA would result in a
change in school district for Village children. Mayor Studebaker
stated there is no link between the Village’s service provider and the
school district or library district. Marble Cliff is part of the
Grandview Heights School District and the Grandview Heights Library
District and that would remain unchanged even if there is a change in
the provider of Village services. Ms. Siefkas asked if a change would
impact participation in the Grandview Heights Parks and Recreation
programs. Mayor Studebaker stated that Village residents could still
participate in Grandview Parks and Recreation programs, but if there
is a change in service providers, residents might have to pay
“non-resident” rates. Ms. Siefkas suggested that the cost of Parks and
Recreation be broken out. Mayor Studebaker stated the bid request will
ask for separate costs for safety service, solid waste collection,
building permits and inspections and parks and recreation.
Mayor
Studebaker asked Council for confirmation of their instruction to
develop a Request for Proposal (RFP). Ms. Siefkas suggested setting a
date for a town hall style meeting regarding the service contract.
Council agreed to arrange a town hall style meeting for November 14th
to review information with residents and receive input. She also
suggested that option for having residents share in the cost of solid
waste collection. Mayor Studebaker stated that the RFP will ask for a
breakdown of costs so that a full analysis of service costs can be
made.
Ms.
Troiano moved staff be instructed to develop a Request for Proposal
for Village services to be distributed to potential providers. Mr.
Roark seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes reported the catalpa tree at 1492 Roxbury Rd. has been
removed. Stump removal will be completed in the next few weeks. He
reported he is gathering quotes and anticipates the tree replacement
will occur later this fall.
Mr.
Johannes reported an agreement has been signed with Environmental
Management for leaf pickup. They provided a rate of $125 / hour as
opposed to Grandview Heights and Brad Conaway both of which proposed a
rate of $160 / hour. A letter is being sent to residents explaining
the service and schedule for leaf pick-up.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Ms. Troiano moved
approval of the September 2011 bills totaling $86,977.64.
Mr. Kukura seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the amended August 2011 bills totaling $96,854.12. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented a
supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation:
$1,500.00 from
1000-715-341-0000 to 1000-715-341-0002 for Legal Fees – Council
Prep.
$1,000.00 from
1000-390-690-0000 to 1000-730-432-0000 for Village Hall Maintenance
$1,000.00 from 1000-410-347-0000 to 1000-730-640-0000 for Building
Inspections.
Ms. Troiano seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2309-11, An Ordinance to
amend Ordinance O-2279-10 (2011 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE) to make a
supplemental appropriation of $1,950.00 to the General Obligation Bond
Retirement Fund. First Reading
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of O-2309-11. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2303-11, An Ordinance
amending Chapter 136 of the Codified Ordinances of the Village of
Marble Cliff, Ohio entitled “Public Order” to enact section 136.16
entitled “Disturbing the Peace.”
Mr.
Banchefsky reviewed the ordinance language. Council asked questions
regarding hours when delivery can occur. Mr. Sterneker expressed
concerns regarding the impact of a conviction under the ordinance on
future school and professional opportunities.
Ms. Troiano moved the
adoption of O-2303-11. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The motion passed five in
favor / one opposed.
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has been in contact with a representative of
the Pizzuti Companies regarding the notice to remove the current
temporary sign by December 31, 2011. They are developing a proposal
for a new sign that might be placed in a different location on the
property. Any proposal for a new sign will come to Council for
approval.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of R-2310-11, A Resolution
accepting the amounts and rates as determined by the Budget Commission
and authorizing the necessary tax levies and certifying them to the
County Auditor.
Mr. Cincione moved the
adoption of R-2310-11. Mr. Kukura seconded. Roll call: Mr. Roark, yes;
Mr. Cincione, yes; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms. Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker,
yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed unanimously.
Council
discussed options for the 2011 holiday party. Ms. Troiano reported
that residents have expressed interest in having a full meal for the
holiday party. The suggestion is that the Village provide the meat and
residents supply the rest of the meal as a “pot luck.” Council also
discussed the option of starting the party later and offering only
cookies, punch and coffee. Council decided to set December 5th
as the date for the party. Ms. Troiano will finalize a recommendation
for format and time. Ms. McKay will reserve OLV and contact Santa to
reserve the date.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 9:40 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro
Tem Fiscal
Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
August 15, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and
Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor,
Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, Administrative
Assistant, William Johannes, and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay.
Visitors and press were present.
VISITORS
Chris
McArtor, Vice President of the Homeowners’ Association at the Cotswold
Condominiums, was present to make comment on a proposal for a new
fence at Prescott Place. However, since the Village did not receive
the formal proposal and representatives of the Pizzuti Companies were
not present to present information to Council, Ms McArtor said she
would withhold comment until a proposal is presented to Council for
consideration.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr.
Sterneker moved adoption of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Roark seconded.
The Consent Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has no new economic development news to report.
He reported that he followed up with the company which is considering
leasing space in the building at 2200 W. Fifth Ave. That business is
still working through a number of issues and has not made a decision
regarding relocation.
Ms. McKay
reported the new tenants at 2100 Marble Cliff Office Park have moved
into the building.
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has contacted Upper Arlington regarding the
possibility of
shared services between Marble Cliff
and Upper Arlington. Upper Arlington has responded that they are
interested in discussions. Ms. McKay reported UA’s concern that the
Village is genuinely interested in pursuing discussions. She reported
she assured them that the Village is genuinely interested in looking
at competitive options for providing services to the Village
residents. Mr. Kukura reported he had contact with one UA official who
expressed interest in pursuing discussions. Mayor Studebaker reported
that a copy of the letter to Upper Arlington was shared with Grandview
Heights Mayor Ray DeGraw.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the Village is working with SWACO and the law firm
of Eastman and Smith to collect competitive bids from companies who
receive recyclables from collectors and haulers. Through SWACO the
Village is participating in the bid process with five other
communities to obtain a bid for receiving recyclables. SWACO provides
the legal services at no cost to the Village except the cost of
advertising the bid request. The process is non-binding on the
Village. However, it is a necessary first step toward bidding solid
waste collection services. Mr. Johannes asked Council for input about
the level of service that should be requested in the bidding process
including day or days for service and curb-side or garage pick-up.
Council discussed the negotiating process for Village services.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented the revised and updated zoning map for Council
consideration. Council agreed to review the map and offer additional
comment prior to the next meeting. Mr. McFarland suggested the Council
take action to officially adopt the map at an upcoming meeting.
Ms. McKay
provided a review of the Village’s year to date financials. She
reported revenues are running ahead of budget estimates in a number of
categories including municipal income taxes. She stated she projects
that the municipal income tax revenue will continue to run ahead of
projections. However, due to the processing of a number of property
tax refunds, including the refund for 1600 Dublin Rd. based on the
county’s reassessment of the value of the property, Village property
tax collections for 2011 will fall below budget estimates but should
bounce back in 2012. Village expenses are tracking as budgeted.
Council discussed the current year figures and the impact of property
tax revaluations.
Ms. McKay
reported the revenue for the Sewer and Water funds is coming in better
than anticipated, which will allow for some sewer and water
expenditures to be moved from the General Fund to those funds as early
as next year. Ms. McKay also reported the interest income to the Falco
Scholarship Fund has benefited from the changes in investments made
earlier this year
Ms. McKay
presented a five year revenue and expenditure projection for the
Village Funds. The updated five year projection shows improvement over
the five year plan presented in 2010 with the General Fund remaining
solvent through 2016 despite continued deficit spending because
expenses continue to outpace revenue. She noted the expense projection
includes a 5% increase each year for Village police, fire and solid
waste services.
Ms. McKay
reviewed the five year capital projects plan and explained that some
of the projects have been moved between years in order to put together
projects every other year that could be part of an OPWC project
application for grant or loan. Mr. McFarland reviewed the major
capital projects planned for the next five years as well as “wish
list” projects for the Village. All projects except the “wish list”
projects are included in the five year financial projections.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes reported the condition of the catalpa tree at 1492 Roxbury
Rd. has not improved and should be removed. He presented quotes of
$1,595 from Ahlum and Arbor and $1,045 from Peterman Tree for removal
of the tree, hauling away the wood and grinding the stump. Mr.
Johannes recommended Peterman Tree be contracted with to do the
project.
Mr. Cincione moved approval of up to $1,100 for removal
of the catalpa tree in the tree lawn at 1492 Roxbury Rd. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the August 2011 bills totaling $96,621.82. Mr. Roark
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the amended July 2011 bills totaling $78,324.04. Ms.
Siefkas seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented a
supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Roark moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation: $49,270 from
1000-800-590-0000 to 1000-910-910-0000 for the 2011 Dublin Road Storm
Sewer Rehabilitation project. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2305-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Fiscal Officer to execute a Depository Agreement for
active, interim and/or inactive public funds with The Huntington
National Bank for the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Sterneker moved
the rules be suspended. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Kukura moved the adoption of O-2305-11. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2306-11, An Ordinance to
establish the 2011 Dublin Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Fund and to
amend Ordinance O-2279-10 (2011 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE) to make a
supplemental appropriation of $194,125.00 to the 2011 Dublin Road
Storm Sewer Rehabilitation Fund.
Mr. Kukura moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Sterneker seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of O-2306-11. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2303-11, An Ordinance
amending Chapter 136 of the Codified Ordinances of the Village of
Marble Cliff, Ohio entitled “Public Order” to enact section 136.16
entitled “Disturbing the Peace.”
Mr.
Banchefsky reviewed changes to the ordinance based on Council input at
the July 25, 2011 meeting. Council confirmed that the proposed
ordinance does not restrict hours of operation for snow blowers and
suggested some adjustment to the times designated in the ordinance.
Mr. Banchefsky will make the suggested changes and the ordinance will
be brought to the September Council meeting for a third reading.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr.
Banchefsky presented a draft ordinance to address “Excessive Noise.”
The language included definitions, hours of restriction, types of
noises to be restricted, exceptions, and penalties. Mr. Kukura
expressed his opinion that the ordinance is unnecessary. He reported
he has spoken to several residents who concur with his opinion. Mr.
Banchefsky stated that some police departments believe they are
assisted by having an ordinance on the books under which they can take
action. Ms. Siefkas expressed her opinion that there would be a
benefit to the Village of having an enforceable ordinance. Mr. Roark
expressed his opinion that the ordinance is not necessary and his
concern that a noise restriction ordinance might be used as a “weapon”
between neighbors. Ms. Siefkas stated her concern that homeowners may
feel comfortable working with their neighbors to resolve issues, but
apartment dwellers may not feel comfortable approaching their
neighbors about excessive noise issues.
Mr. Cincione stated
his opinion that the ordinance is unnecessary. Ms. Troiano,
Mr. Kukura and Mr.
Roark concurred with Mr. Cincione. Council decided not to bring the
draft ordinance to the table for formal consideration at this time.
Council
discussed the removal of the temporary Prescott Place sales/marketing
sign at the corner of Arlington Ave. and Cardigan Ave. Ms. McKay will
review the temporary sign permit and contact Prescott Place regarding
the status of the sign.
Mayor
Studebaker thanked Mr. Cincione and Mr. Sterneker for representing the
Village at the Grandview High School Band concert in Falco Park on
August 14th.
ADJOURN
Mr. Cincione moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:50 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF July 25, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
July 25, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and Kendy A. Troiano;
Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky,
Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, Administrative Assistant, William
Johannes, and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay. Visitors and press were
present.
Mr. Roark moved Mr. Kukura be excused. Mr. Cincione seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
VISITORS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of R-2304-11, A Resolution to
adopt the Solid Waste Management Plan for the Solid Waste Authority of
Central Ohio.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced Albert Iosue from SWACO and asked him to explain
the proposed update to the Solid Waste Management Plan for the Solid
Waste Authority of Central Ohio. Mr. Iosue explained that each waste
authority in Ohio is required to have a 15 year plan which is updated
and approved every 5 years. The EPA has completed a preliminary review
of the plan update and SWACO is now requesting review and approval by
the participating municipalities. To date, 35 of the 41 of the
municipalities have approved the plan. Mr. Roark asked what would
happen if the EPA did not approve the plan. Mr. Iosue stated that,
based on the EPA’s preliminary review and comments, he anticipates the
EPA will give final approval. Mr. Roark asked if anything in the plan
specifically impacts the Village. Mr. Iosue explained that nothing in
the plan is municipality specific, but applies to all municipalities
in their service area.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of R-2304-11. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr.
Cincione moved adoption of the Consent Agenda. Ms. Siefkas seconded.
The Consent Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has no new economic development information. He
reported there is still discussion going on with some businesses who
have expressed interest in moving to the Village.
Ms.
Siefkas asked if the Village has received any comments about the
removal of trees at the former NiSource property. Ms. McKay reported
the Village Hall received one telephone call and one email. Both
expressed concerns about the removal of the trees. Ms. McKay stated
she or Mr. Johannes explained the tree removal was part of the plan to
expand the parking lot and that new landscaping is planned for the
property.
Mr. Johannes stated he
has received positive comments about the appearance of the property
and several Council members reported similar positive comments.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented the results from the bidding for the Arlington
Ave. Crack and Slurry Seal Project. Two contractors submitted bids –
Strawser Construction and American Pavements – with American Pavements
offering the lower bid at $29,852.75. Both bids were below the
engineer’s estimate. Mr. McFarland reported the project would begin
sometime in late August or early September. Mr. Sterneker asked that
the contractor be requested to avoid work the week of the Our Lady of
Victory Festival (August 19th and 20th). Mr.
McFarland agreed that the contractor would schedule around the
festival dates so as not to create any traffic or parking problems.
Mr. McFarland recommended Council accept the American Pavements, Inc.
bid for the project.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2301-11, An Ordinance
accepting a bid for the 2011 Arlington Ave. Crack & Slurry Seal
Project, waiving any bid irregularities, and declaring an emergency.
Mr. Sterneker moved
the rules be suspended. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of O-2301-11. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Council removed the
emergency condition from Ordinance O-2301-11.
Mr.
McFarland presented a quote from Decker Construction to complete
repairs of several points of pavement distress along Arlington Ave.
prior to the crack and slurry seal project. The point repairs will
extend the life of the crack and slurry seal. Ms. McKay reported the
Council has appropriated adequate street funds for the repair work.
Mr.
Cincione moved acceptance of the Decker Construction quote for
pavement repairs on Arlington Ave. and approval of up to $9,000.00 for
the project. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr.
McFarland reported he is completing
the bid book for the 2011 Dublin Rd. Storm Sewer Rehabilitation
Bidding Process and plans to have a contract recommendation for
Council by the September Council meeting.
Mr.
McFarland presented a revised zoning map for Council review and
explained the changes made to the map last approved in 2004. Council
discussed the changes to the map and made suggestions for additional
changes and corrections. Mr. McFarland will incorporate the
suggestions and bring the final map to the August Council meeting for
approval.
Mr.
McFarland reported, in response to complaints received, he wrote
letters to two residents who had parked boats on Village streets
asking that they be removed. Both boats were removed as requested.
Mr.
McFarland reported the updated drainage system at 1489 Arlington Ave.
has been installed and the concerns raised by Council during the
variance process for the pool installation at that address appear to
be addressed.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes reported there has been an increase in traffic accidents at
the W. Fifth Ave. and Dublin Rd. intersection. The increase appears to
be related to the increase in traffic through the intersection as a
result of the Lane Ave. detour in place through mid or late August.
Mr. Johannes reported he has discussed the situation with the City of
Columbus Traffic Engineering Department which has made adjustments to
the traffic signal timing to ease and improve traffic flow during the
Lane Ave. construction.
Mr. Johannes also
discussed the situation with Upper Arlington’s Traffic Engineering
Department. They apologized for failing to give Marble Cliff advanced
warning of the planned detour, but reported the construction work
should be completed on or ahead of schedule.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the July 2011 bills totaling $76,856.58. Mr. Roark
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the amended June 2011 bills totaling $70,666.98. Ms.
Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented a
supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation:
$20,000 from
1000-800-397-0000 to 1000-730-346-0000 for CMOM Engineering fees.
$1,000 from
1000-710-351-0000 to 1000-715-325-0000 for legal advertising.
Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2302-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Fiscal Officer to execute a depository agreement for
active, interim and/or inactive public funds with PNC Bank for the
Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The
motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of
O-2302-11. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of R-2299-11, A Resolution
reauthorizing an agreement between the Village of Marble Cliff and the
Board of County Commissioners, Franklin County, Ohio on behalf of the
Village of Marble Cliff in order to participate in the Franklin
County, Ohio Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)
Entitlement Program and abide by the covenants of that program as
stated herein.Mr.
Roark moved the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion
passed unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of R-2299-11. Mr.
Sterneker seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2303-11, An Ordinance
amending Chapter 136 of the Codified Ordinances of the Village of
Marble Cliff, Ohio entitled “Public Order” to enact section 136.16
entitled “Disturbing the Peace.”
Mr.
Banchefsky reviewed the newly drafted section designed to limit hours
of work and related noise. Council discussed the proposed ordinance
and made several recommendations for changes as well as suggestions
for clarifying the language.
Mr. Banchefsky will
incorporate the recommendations and suggestions of Council into the
proposed ordinance for discussion at the August Council meeting.
Mr.
Banchefsky explained the difficulties of establishing and enforcing a
traditional noise ordinance. He explained that they can be challenged
constitutionally and they can create enforcement difficulties.
Grandview Police Chief Wood explained that the police, when they are
notified of a noise issue, approach the situation with an attitude of
encouraging consideration of the neighbors and the entire
neighborhood. Mr. Banchefsky provided a sample noise ordinance
designed to address non-human, device noise such as amplified music.
Council discussed the benefits as well as the challenges of crafting
and enforcing a noise ordinance to curb noise created by parties and
playing at “late” hours.” Ms. Siefkas expressed interest in having an
ordinance that creates fines and consequences for disturbing the quiet
at late hours. Mayor Studebaker commented that the sample ordinance
language does not specify hours of enforcement.
Mr. Roark
asked if there is a history of problems that would indicate the need
for a noise ordinance. Ms. Siefkas reported that there have been
problems in the past with one of the larger apartment complexes. Mr.
Sterneker asked Mr. Banchefsky to summarize his concerns and
reservations about a traditional noise ordinance. Mr. Banchefsky
stated that the ordinance could be challenged constitutionally or
challenged for being unevenly enforced or for being “vague.” Research
has shown that such ordinances can be used by some residents as
“weapons” demanding strict enforcement and creating difficulties for
police and elected officials. Ms. McKay suggested that the Village
collect information regarding complaints from the police department
over the balance of the summer to determine if an issue exists that
requires legislation. Chief Wood agreed to report complaints and
gather information that would be helpful to Council in their decision
making process.
Mr.
Sterneker reported the Grandview and Marble Cliff area has a large
number of children’s soccer teams and because of construction at the
elementary and middle school complex there are insufficient practice
fields for this fall. Mr. Sterneker asked Council to allow the
Village’s Cardigan Ave. lot to be used as a soccer practice field. The
use would require the removal of one tree and its stump. Mr. Sterneker
stated they would place temporary goals for the season and the field
would be used two to three times a week after 5:00 pm. Mr. Roark asked
if there is sufficient parking without disturbing the businesses in
the area. Mr. Sterneker stated his opinion that there is sufficient
parking along the edge of the field for the number of cars that are
usually present at a practice. Mr. Sterneker stated that team
representatives would mow the field during the season.
Ms.
Siefkas asked if other groups would want to use the field and might
that create scheduling problems. Mr. Sterneker stated he does not
anticipate scheduling conflicts.
Mr. Banchefsky stated
his opinion that the Village would not have increased liability if the
field is used as a soccer practice area but asked the Fiscal Officer
to check with the Village’s insurance carrier to confirm adequate and
appropriate coverage. Ms. McKay stated her concern that parents might
drop children off on the east side of the railroad tracks and allow
them to cross the tracks to get to the field.
Council
agreed to allow the Village owned field on Cardigan Ave to be used
this fall as a soccer practice field, but asked that coaches and
parents be informed in writing that the railroad track should not be
crossed and that the business along Cardigan Ave. be informed of the
intended use. Council authorized Mr. Sterneker to remove the tree and
stump in the practice area at no cost to the Village.
Ms.
Troiano asked if Council is interested in arranging a pot luck, end of
summer picnic. Staff reported no interest has been expressed to the
office. Mr. Sterneker reported one group has been discussing the
possibility of an activity, but had no additional details. Ms. Troiano
stated she would gather more information.
Ms.
Troiano reported receiving calls regarding a police report of jewelry
missing from the home of a resident who was preparing to move. The
jewelry in question had apparently not been accounted for in several
years and the police report indicated there was no evidence to confirm
theft. Ms. Troiano suggested holding another Block Watch meeting in
August or September. Chief Wood confirmed that the police cannot
confirm when the jewelry in question might have been lost or if it was
taken by a family member or stolen by burglary or theft. Council
agreed that the Block Watch meeting can be held at Village Hall and
Chief Wood agreed to attend the meeting to address concerns.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:50 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
June 13, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and Kendy A. Troiano;
Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky,
Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, Administrative Assistant, William
Johannes, and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay. No visitors or press were
present.
Mr. Roark moved Mr.
Kukura be excused. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr.
Cincione moved adoption of the Consent Agenda. Ms. Siefkas seconded.
The Consent Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he, Mr. Banchefsky and Ms. McKay met with a tech
company with 25 employees which is considering relocating into the
building at 2200 W. Fifth Ave. They plan to grow to 80 employees over
the next six years. The company has asked the Village to consider
extending financial incentives to the company. The company has also
requested the Village actively support their application for
incentives available from the state. Mayor Studebaker stated the
Village would consider financial incentives and would support their
application to the state for incentives. The company considers the
2200 W. Fifth Ave. to be in “move in” condition and hopes to make a
decision fairly quickly. The building space will accommodate their
proposed growth.
Mayor
Studebaker reported he met with Robert Meyers of Riverside 10, LLC.
Mayor Studebaker toured the building at 1600 Dublin Rd. with Mr.
Meyers. The owners have begun replacing some of the trees removed for
the parking lot expansion. Mr. Meyers also reported that a lease has
been signed for the first floor of the north building. The new tenants
are NiSource and they plan to bring in approximately 35 employees and
may grow to 50. The employees are in accounting and human resources.
Mr. Meyers reported Riverside 10, LLC is still in negotiations for
leasing the second floor of the north building. Mayor Studebaker also
reported the new owners are considering not adding the new “portal”
structure between the north and south buildings which was presented to
Council at the regular May meeting.
ENGINEER’S
REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented two letters of agreement for engineering services.
One agreement is for the 2011 Dublin Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation
(attached to O-2297-11) and the other is for the CMOM project
(attached to O-2298-11). Mr. McFarland explained the scope of services
for both projects and answered Council questions.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2297-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Mayor and Fiscal Officer to enter into an agreement
with Burgess & Niple, Inc. for professional engineering services for
the 2011 Dublin Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation for the Village of
Marble Cliff.
Mr. Cincione moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of O-2297-11. Ms. Troiano seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2298-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Mayor and Fiscal Officer to enter into an agreement
with Burgess & Niple, Inc., for professional engineering services for
a Capacity Assessment, Management, Operation and Maintenance Program (CMOM)
as required by the OEPA Findings and Orders dated February 11, 2009
for the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr.
McFarland explained the “not to exceed fee” is established at a fee
that would cover the engineering fee if Burgess and Niple completed
all of the work. However, the plan is to have the Village staff
perform the bulk of the work with B&N acting in a consulting and
oversight capacity.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of O-2298-11. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr.
McFarland reviewed the plan prepared in 2010 which outlined a long
term pavement maintenance plan for Village streets. The plan
recommends the Village perform crack and slurry seal on Arlington Ave.
north of W. Third Ave. this year. The estimated cost of the work is
$36,000. Mr. McFarland asked Council if they would like for him to
collect bids for the project. Ms. McKay reported the cost of the
project is included in the budget for 2011. Mr. McFarland stated the
project should be completed by mid-October to avoid weather problems.
Mr. Sterneker asked how long the process extends the life of the
street pavement. Mr. McFarland stated it will extend the pavement life
for 5 or 6 years. Council asked Mr. McFarland to prepare the bid
package. The project will come back to Council for final approval
after bids are collected.
Mr.
McFarland updated Council on the status of the swimming pool project
at 1489 Arlington Ave. Mr. McFarland has recommended to the home owner
an option for updating and improving the drainage on the property. He
has suggested a new line be installed to drain the pool surround and
the roof drains on the west side of the house be disconnected from the
existing drainage system and piped instead to Cardigan Ave. Council
asked Mr. McFarland to follow up with a letter to the home owner and
contractor documenting the recommendations that have been made, a time
schedule for finalizing the new drainage system and establishing a
process for Mr. McFarland to give final approval for the plan.
Mayor
Studebaker reported a third violation of the hours of work specified
in the variance approved by Council for the swimming pool at 1489
Arlington Ave. Mayor Studebaker reported the home owners have received
one written and two verbal notices of the violation. Council discussed
options for addressing the violations. No action was taken.
Ms.
Siefkas asked about the construction at 1449 Arlington Ave. Mayor
Studebaker stated the home owners have been conscientiously notifying
neighbors about the project and provided contact numbers to allow
neighbors to contact them if they have any questions or concerns about
the work being done.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes reported Paul Peterson Company has begun the work to replace
traffic signs throughout the Village.
Mr.
Johannes reported he authorized the removal of a dead crabapple tree
on the Cambridge Island. He did not recommend replacement at this
time, but will add it to the list of tree to be replaced at some time
in the future.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Roark moved
approval of the June 2011 bills totaling $63,644.05. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay
reported she requested competitive quotes for the Village’s insurance.
However, none were received. The Village’s independent agent reported
to Ms. McKay that she was unable to secure any quotes competitive with
the Village’s current coverage package and premium. Ms. McKay also
reported a representative
of Wells Fargo asked for information to bid but declined to bid after
review of coverage and current premium. The renewal premium of $6,673
is $114 lower than the 2010 premium as a result the Village’s credit
for good claims experience.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2300-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Mayor and Fiscal Officer to execute an agreement to
renew the policy with Ohio Government Risk Management Plan for
property, liability, wrongful acts, automobile, bond, crime, inland
marine and electronic data processing insurance.
Mr. Sterneker moved
the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Ms. Troiano moved the adoption of O-2300-11. Mr. Roark
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2291-11, An Ordinance
adopting a budget for the year 2012 for the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Roark moved the
adoption of O-2291-11. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the fifth reading of O-2288-11, An Ordinance
amending Section 136.04 (disorderly conduct) of the Code of Ordinances
of the Village of Marble Cliff, Ohio.
Mr. Cincione moved to
table indefinitely O-2288-11. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mr. Banchefsky
presented sample language for an “Hours of Work” and a “Noise”
ordinance. Mr. Banchefsky reviewed the proposed language for the
“Hours of Work” legislation and the “Noise” legislation. Council asked
Mr. Banchefsky questions, discussed the proposed language and offered
suggestions for revision. Council expressed their concern that the
ability of homeowners to perform work on their homes and yards be
balanced against the need for neighbors to be able to enjoy their
property without noisy disturbances. Ms. Siefkas stated her opinion
that the proposed language is promising. She suggested the language
separate the restrictions on home owners from the restrictions on
commercial construction work. Mr. Banchefsky stated he would modify
the proposed language to address the issues raised by Council and
bring it to the July meeting for consideration.
Mr.
Banchefsky presented a copy of New Albany’s “Amplified Noise
Restriction” language and explained the pros and cons of the language.
Council discussed the language and made suggestions for revisions
applicable to Marble Cliff. Mayor Studebaker reminded Council that
residents raised concerns about noise and noisy activities as part of
recent variance discussions. Those concerns prompted the consideration
of noise and hours of work legislation. Council asked Mr. Banchefsky
to draft language for formal consideration. Mr. Banchefsky also
suggested that Mayor Studebaker speak with the Grandview Heights
Police Chief for his suggestions and recommendations.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the Falco Scholarship Committee awarded a $750
scholarship to Emma McGregor.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of R-2299-11, A Resolution
reauthorizing an agreement between the Village of Marble Cliff and the
Board of County Commissioners, Franklin County, Ohio on behalf of the
Village of Marble Cliff in order to participate in the Franklin
County, Ohio Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)
Entitlement Program and abide by the covenants of that program as
stated herein. No action was taken.
Council
discussed moving the regular July Council meeting to July 25th
because two members are unable to attend on the scheduled date.
Council asked Ms. McKay to confirm members’ availability on the 25th.
Mayor
Studebaker thanked Ms. Troiano for representing the Village at the
Blue Star Mothers Memorial Day service.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:45 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T. Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 16, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
May 16, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and
Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor,
Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, Administrative
Assistant, William Johannes, and Fiscal Officer, Cynthia McKay.
Visitors and press were present.
PUBLIC HEARING – 2012
BUDGET
Mayor
Studebaker opened the Public Hearing for the 2012 Budget and
introduced the second reading of O-2291-11, An Ordinance adopting a
budget for the year 2012 for the Village of Marble Cliff. Ms. McKay
reviewed the proposed budget and reported no comments or questions had
been received at Village Hall prior to the hearing. Council asked
question then the Mayor opened the floor to the public for questions
and comments. No questions or comments were received. Mayor Studebaker
closed the Public Hearing.
VARIANCES AND PERMITS
Mayor
Studebaker invited John Behal, architect for Riverside 10 LLC (the new
owners of 1600 Dublin Rd.), to describe the proposed architectural and
landscaping changes to 1600 Dublin Rd. Mr. Behal provided Council with
updated plans and renderings for the property and described the
proposed changes to the façade of the north building and the new
“entrance portal” to be installed between the north and south
buildings. He also explained the proposed revisions to the parking lot
to increase the number of parking spaces from 590 to 640. Mr. Behal
pointed out the future plans for the property might include a small
outbuilding that could be a bank or medical office building. He stated
any such plan will be brought back to Council for separate approval.
Mr. Behal
reviewed the three variances requested by Riverside 10 LLC and
explained the purpose of each of the requests for variance from
existing code. Council asked questions and discussed the project as
presented.
Robert
Meyers, representing Riverside 10 LLC, reviewed the existing
buildings’ construction and the available square footage available for
lease. Mr. Meyers told Council he and his partners have been
considering options for improving the property for several years and
are very pleased with the decisions that have been made. He hopes to
move forward on the work almost immediately – if the weather permits.
Mr. Meyers stated 60 trees between 4.5 and 6.5 inches in caliper have
been purchased as part of new landscaping for the property.
Mr. Meyers
also reported that in addition to the current tenants which will
remain, Riverside 10 LLC has several leasing proposals outstanding and
anticipates finalizing one of those proposals within the coming days.
That lease would bring approximately 60 new employees to the north
building by midsummer.
Ms.
Troiano asked if the variances under consideration include the
proposed curb cut. Mr. Behal stated that the curb cut and signage with
be considered separately.
Ms. McKay confirmed
that the Village offices received no comments in favor or opposition
to the requested variances. Council discussed the advantages and
challenges of the designed additional curb cut. Ms. Troiano asked if
the additional parking places will be adequate. Mr. Behal said he
believes the parking will be adequate based on standard engineering
assumptions and the type of tenants anticipated. Mayor Studebaker
asked if development of the outbuilding will create a need for
additional parking. Mr. Meyers stated the parking is designed to be
adequate even if the outbuilding is constructed.
Mr. Meyers also
explained expanded video camera monitoring is being installed on the
property to improve overall security at the site.
Mr. Behal
explained that the new entry is an architectural element, but does not
provide new usable space. The structure is an open “arch” which will
add height and focus to the building as a unifying point.
Mr.
McFarland stated his reservation about O-2295-11 which would approve
use of the Village right of way. Mr. Kukura asked if the variance
would allow expanded use of the right of way. Mayor Studebaker pointed
out that the variance language limits the use to the West Fifth Ave.
side of the property and is defined by the drawings attached to the
variance application.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2293-11, An Ordinance
granting a lot coverage variance to Riverside 10 LLC, for the property
at 1600 Dublin Road, in the Village of Marble Cliff and declaring an
emergency.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of O-2293-11. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the
ordinance be adopted as emergency legislation for purposes of economic
development and for construction to begin during the current
construction season. Ms. Troiano seconded. Roll call: Mr. Roark, yes;
Mr. Cincione, yes; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms. Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker,
yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2294-11, An Ordinance
granting a height variance to Riverside 10 LLC for the property at
1600 Dublin Road in the Village of Marble Cliff and declaring an
emergency.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the adoption of O-2294-11. Mr. Sterneker
seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the
ordinance be adopted as emergency legislation for purposes of economic
development and for construction to begin during the current
construction season. Ms. Troiano seconded. Roll call: Mr. Roark, yes;
Mr. Cincione, yes; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms. Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker,
yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2295-11, An Ordinance
granting a variance allowing occupancy of public right-of-way to
Riverside 10 LLC for the property at 1600 Dublin Road in the Village
of Marble Cliff and declaring an emergency.
Mr. Roark moved the
rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mr. Sterneker moved the adoption of O-2295-11. Ms.
Siefkas seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Roark moved the
ordinance be adopted as emergency legislation for purposes of economic
development.
Ms. Troiano seconded.
Roll call: Mr. Roark, yes; Mr. Cincione, no; Mr. Kukura, yes; Ms.
Siefkas, yes; Mr. Sterneker, yes; Ms. Troiano, yes. The motion passed
5 in favor and one opposed.
At this point Mr.
Kukura was excused from the meeting to present a Falco Scholarship
award at the Grandview Heights High School Award Assembly.
VISITORS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced David Wood, the new Chief of Police for
Grandview Heights. Mr. Wood provided Council with a brief summary of
his professional career and personal connections to the Grandview and
Marble Cliff area. Mayor Studebaker told Council he participated in
the hiring interviews with Chief Wood and stressed the importance of
having the chief be a visible presence in the community. Chief Wood
expressed his pleasure with the new opportunities to interact with the
community and its residents that his new position presents. He also
indicated his plan to have the Grandview police officers out of their
cruisers and interacting with the community whenever possible.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr. Roark moved
adoption of the Consent Agenda. Ms. Troiano seconded. The Consent
Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has been contacted by SWACO asking for
community recommendations to fill an open public representative
position on the SWACO Board. Council offered no recommendations.
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has met with Grandview Heights Mayor DeGraw and
Council President Reynolds and discussed the Village’s contract for
services with Grandview Heights. The current contract for services
expires at the end of 2011. Mayor Studebaker shared with Mayor DeGraw
and Mr. Reynolds that Village Council has asked staff to review
options for Village services beyond Grandview Heights. He noted that
Grandview is currently in negotiations for a new police contract.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the annual Blue Star Mothers Memorial Day Service
will be held on May 26th.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland reported the Village received notice that the application
for an OPWC grant has been approved. The Village will receive a
$144,000 grant toward the project to repair the storm water sewer
lines under Dublin Rd. Because the award is a grant, the Village will
not be required to repay the $144,000. The Village will, however, be
required to add approximately $45,000 directly to the project.
Mr.
McFarland reported the OEPA has received the Village’s SSES Report and
approved it as the Final SSES Report as required by the Director’s
Findings and Orders. The approval releases the Village from additional
SSES testing and reporting.
Mr. McFarland and
Village staff will begin work on the CMOM report – also required by
the Director’s Findings and Orders – which is due in February 2012.
Mr.
McFarland reported the Village has received final drawings for the
proposed bike path along Dublin Rd. in the Village. Mr. McFarland and
Ms. McKay met with representatives of the City of Columbus to address
concerns indentified by Mr. McFarland in his review of the plans. The
City of Columbus has agreed to provide pedestrian crossing signals at
the intersection of Dublin Rd. and W. Fifth Ave. as part of the
project. They have also agreed to make any necessary changes to the
design to ensure that current storm water retention and water quality
issues are addressed as required by Village Code and existing property
easements.
Mr.
McFarland reported he sent a letter to Ed Bowman, owner of the
property at 1400 Dublin Rd. informing him that the sign on the
property is in violation of Village Code requirements for maintenance
and safety. Mr. Bowman has responded and indicated his intention to
make the necessary repairs in a timely fashion.
Mr.
McFarland has met with the contractor installing the pool at 1489
Arlington Ave. and examined the existing drainage system on the
property. The grade of the system is designed to drain predominately
to Arlington Ave. However, the system does not have an outlet into the
Village’s storm water collection system. Rather it drains into a small
French drain gravel pit immediately behind the curb on Arlington Ave.
In addition to draining ground water, the downspouts on the house are
tied into the system. Mr. McFarland is continuing to work with the
contractor and the property owner to ensure the drainage system is
adequate.
Mr.
McFarland also met with Richard Dick, 2001 Cardigan Ave., to review
ongoing issues of standing water on his property. Mr. McFarland stated
his opinion that the major cause of standing water on the 2001
Cardigan Ave. property is the landscaping which has filled the natural
swale that previously moved water off the property to the west.
Mr. McFarland shared
his opinion with the property owner and suggested possible options to
correct the identified problems.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes presented quotes for replacing traffic and parking signs
throughout the Village. He asked Council for approval of the proposal
from Paul Peterson for up to $4,800 for the purchase of up to 101 new
signs and up to 6 new sign posts. Mr. Roark moved approval of the
quote from Paul Peterson of up to $4,800.00 for purchase and
installation of up to 101 new traffic and parking signs and up to 6
new posts. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The motion was approved unanimously.
Council discussed the high number of signs in the Village and asked
Mr. Johannes to identify any signs that can be removed or moved onto
another existing pole or post.
Mr.
Johannes presented quotes for pruning and trimming lawn trees on
Cambridge and Blvd. Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the quote from Brad Conaway of up to $6,500.00 for pruning
51 trees along Cambridge between 3rd and 5th
Aves. and Cardigan between Cambridge Blvd. and Roxbury. Ms. Siefkas
seconded. The motion was approved unanimously.
Mr.
Johannes reported he plans to have 15 cubic yards of wood chips
delivered on May 23rd for maintenance of the Tarpy Woods
path. The work will be done by members of the Grandview Heights High
School senior class.
Mr. Kukura returned at
this point. Mr. McFarland left the meeting at this point.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Roark moved
approval of the May 2011 bills totaling $103,652.39. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented a
supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Sterneker moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation:
$20,000 from
1000-800-590-0000 to 1000-715-341-0000 for legal fees for Bond
Refinancing.
$10,000 from 3101-850-720-0000 to 3101-850-790-0000 for “early call”
penalty on General Obligation Bond.
Mr. Roark seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the fourth reading of O-2288-11, An Ordinance
amending Section 136.04 (disorderly conduct) of the Code of Ordinances
of the Village of Marble Cliff, Ohio. Mr. Banchefsky asked Council to
defer action on the proposed ordinance until the June Council meeting.
Ms. Troiano suggested the disorderly conduct and noise portion of the
proposed ordinance should be separated. Mr. Banchefsky concurred with
Ms. Troiano’s recommendation. Mr. Kukura recommended that snow blowers
should not be included in the time restrictions in the proposed
ordinance.
Ms. McKay
reported the bond refinancing paperwork is close to completion.
Mr. Kukura asked if
the Village has received a final bill from the bond counsel. Ms. McKay
reported an estimate of approximately $15,000 has been received.
Mr. Kukura
reported the Falco Scholarship Committee awarded a $1,000 scholarship
to Alex Jones. The committee is still considering an additional
award.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2296-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the expenditure of funds of $350 for the Music in the Park
Program and declaring the expenditure to constitute a public purpose.Mr.
Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Roark seconded. The motion
passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of O-2296-11. Mr.
Kukura seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2297-11, An Ordinance
authorizing the Mayor and Fiscal Officer to enter into an agreement
with Burgess & Niple, Inc. for professional engineering services for
the 2011 Dublin Road Storm Sewer Rehabilitation for the Village of
Marble Cliff. No action was taken.
ADJOURN
Mr. Cincione moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:45 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
April 18, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker, and
Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village Solicitor,
Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland, Administrative
Assistant, William Johannes, and Fiscal Officer Cynthia McKay. No
visitors or press were present.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr. Kukura moved
adoption of the Consent Agenda. Mr. Cincione seconded. The Consent
Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported no new information related to economic development
in the Village.
Mayor
Studebaker reported the 2010 Federal Census shows the Village
population is now 573. The population was 646 according to the 2000
Federal Census. The number of housing units is up to 321 from 303 in
2000. The decrease in population is related to the closing of St.
Raphael’s Home for the Aged; the increase in housing units is related
to the Prescott Place development of the St. Raphael’s property.
Council
agreed to move the June regular Council meeting to June 13, 2011.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland reported the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency has
acknowledged receipt of the Village’s final SSES Report. Mr. McFarland
is corresponding with the agency to address a few items. But he
believes good progress is being made toward final approval of the
submitted report.
Mr.
McFarland reported the Village’s application for an Ohio Public Works
Commission grant has been moved to the Small Government Program. The
application scored 55 which agreed with Mr. McFarland’s initial
scoring. Final notification will occur in early May.
Mr.
McFarland reported the storm water inlet in front of 1600 Fernwood
Ave. partially collapsed. The necessary repair of the inlet and an
additional inlet on the west side of Fernwood Ave. were repaired by
Decker Construction.
Mr.
McFarland reported the Village received final engineer’s drawings for
the City of Columbus bike path. He has reviewed the plans and
identified items which need to be addressed by the City of Columbus
before moving forward on the construction.
Mr.
Johannes reported Mr. McFarland has contacted the Mattingly family on
Cambridge Blvd. instructing them to replace the broken sidewalk at the
front of their property by April 29, 2011. The damage was a result of
plumbing work performed on the property.
Mr. McFarland left the
meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes reported the Cambridge Island fountain is running. Peabody
updated the electrical outlets for improved operation and safety.
Mr.
Johannes informed Council he is collecting quotes for pruning and
trimming trees in the Village tree lawn on Cardigan and Cambridge
between 5th and 3rd Ave.
Mr.
Johannes also reported he is completing a Village sign inventory to
identify signs for replacement.
Mr.
Johannes reported a resident asked if he can place a bee hive on his
property. Mr. Johannes stated there are no regulations restricting a
resident from having a bee hive, but he recommended the resident
inform his neighbors to ensure that children are made aware of the
hive.
Mr.
Johannes also reported receiving an inquiry from a non-resident
regarding Village restriction of solar panels or wind turbines. He
stated there are no existing restrictions. Council discussed the
inquiry. Mr. Cincione stated he has very little concern about solar
panels, but is curious whether the Village might have a location where
a turbine could be installed to the benefit of the Village. No action
was taken.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Cincione moved
approval of the April 2011 bills totaling $63,111.00. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.Mr. Sterneker moved approval
of the amended March 2011 bills totaling $67,591.02. Mr. Kukura
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S REPORT
Ms. McKay
presented a supplement appropriation for Council review and approval.
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriation:
$24.36 from
9976-990-990-0000 to 9976-710-391-0000 for payment of bank fee
Ms. Siefkas seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Working
with Mayor Studebaker and Mr. Banchefsky, Ms McKay reported she has
modified the Village’s investments with 5/3 Bank. The Falco
Scholarship Fund investment has been moved to two, $100,000 CD’s which
will pay interest into a government money market account for
distribution. The CD’s invest only the principal of the fund which
cannot be spent. The two CD’s have a staggered maturity dates to
maximize interest income.
Ms. McKay
reported she has altered the Village’s pooled investment with 5/3 Bank
in a similar fashion to the Falco Scholarship Fund. $800,000 has been
invested in 8 CD’s with staggered maturity dates that will pay monthly
or quarterly interest into a government money market account. The
intent of the change is to increase interest income while ensuring the
Village is never more than three months away from a $100,000
investment maturity in the event of an unexpected expense.
Mr.
Sterneker asked if the Village is limited in its investment options.
Ms. McKay reported she has not had the financial training required by
the state to participate in expanded investment options.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the third reading of O-2288-11, An Ordinance
amending Section 136.04 (disorderly conduct) of the Code of Ordinances
of the Village of Marble Cliff, Ohio.
Mr.
Banchefsky suggested the ordinance be tabled until he has an
opportunity to revise the language. Mayor Studebaker pointed out that
Ms. Siefkas has also suggested the hours of noise restriction on
Sunday be expanded. Mr. Studebaker recommended the ordinance be held
over for an additional reading. Council concurred with the
recommendation
Mr. Kukura
updated Council on the status of the Park Bond refinancing. He
reported that, after discussion with Mayor Studebaker, Mr. Banchefsky,
and Ms. McKay, the recommendation is to accept the Huntington Bank
offer to refinance the bond at 3.99%. He also recommended that the
Village pay the early call fee of $10,000 and the attorney’s fees
directly and not roll those costs into the refinancing. Mr. Banchefsky
has discussed the proposal with Rebecca Princehorn, Village Bond
Counsel, and she concurs with the recommendation. Mr. Banchefsky
suggested the following motion to adjust the previously approved
legislation regarding the refinancing: Motion
to accept the term sheet from Huntington National Bank dated April 18,
2011 and to eliminate the requirement that bonds be in book entry form
only.
Mr. Cincione moved the
Village Council accept the term sheet from Huntington National Bank
dated April 18, 2011 and to eliminate the requirement that bonds be in
book entry form only. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Ms. McKay
reported she has met with Gail Anderson from Cotswold Condominiums to
arrange for Village trash and recycling services by June 1, 2011.
Education materials are being prepared. The trash dumpsters will be
removed and the north dumpster will be replaced with a small shed to
hold condominium equipment and trash cans for the two units that do
not have garages.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of
O-2291-11, An Ordinance adopting a budget for the year
2012 for the Village of Marble Cliff. No action was taken.
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the first reading of O-2292-11, An Ordinance to
amend Ordinance O-2279-10 (2011 APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE) to make a
supplemental appropriation of $24.36 to the Falco Scholarship Fund.Mr.
Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Mr. Sterneker seconded. The
motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved the adoption of
O-2292-11. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
Ms. McKay asked Council if they would like to
host the Grandview Heights Marching Band for Music in the Park. Mr.
Watkins has suggested August 14th. Council agreed to the
proposed date. Ms. McKay will bring the necessary legislation to the
May meeting.
Mayor Studebaker reported there are three baby
foxes living under his porch.
Mr. Johannes reported he has arranged for a
volunteer to remove a dead tree from Tarpy Woods. The volunteer will
sign a volunteer release form before beginning the work.
Mr. Sterneker reported the Friends of Tarpy
Woods performed Earth Day cleanup in the park. There are branches that
need to be removed.
Ms. Troiano reported she has received
complaints regarding cats running loose in the Village. She has
contacted the GH Police Department. Council agreed the next option is
for the individual to file a formal complaint to be heard in Mayor’s
Court.
ADJOURN
Mr. Roark moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Cincione seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:00 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T. Roark
Cynthia A.
McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
March 21, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00 pm.
Those in attendance were: Council Members: Matthew A. Cincione, John
F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, and Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E.
Studebaker, Village Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer,
Louis McFarland, Administrative Assistant, William Johannes, and
Fiscal Officer Cynthia McKay. Visitors were present.
Mr. Cincione moved
Council President David T. Roark and Council Member Robert W.
Sterneker be excused. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
VISITORS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced Gail Anderson from the Cotswold Condominium
Association. Ms. Anderson explained their property has recently had
problems with illegal dumping and “dumpster diving” at one of the two
dumpsters on their property. Consequently they have had trash
overflowing the dumpsters and blowing onto neighboring property. Ms.
Anderson asked if the condominium residents could begin to use Village
services through Grandview Heights and remove the dumpsters from their
property.
Mayor
Studebaker explained that the Cotswold property was not served by the
Village when it was a commercial rental property. However, other
residential condominiums in the Village do receive their trash
services from the Village. Linda Siefkas commented that she has
received some complaints from Prescott Place residents about the
conditions surrounding the dumpster on the south end of the property.
Ms. Anderson has contacted the police for assistance to identify the
illegal dumpers.
Ms. McKay
reported she has contacted the Grandview Heights Service Department to
determine whether they could expand services to include Cotswold and
whether there would be an additional charge for the expanded services.
Ms. McKay stated the expanded services from the Village would also
include recycling. She also stated that the change would involve
educating the residents about services as well as how to arrange for
bulk pick-ups when those services are needed.
Joe Sugar
from Prescott Place expressed his support for moving the Cotswold
Condominiums to Village services.
Council
expressed support for moving the Cotswold Condominiums to Village
services and asked staff to continue to work with Ms. Anderson to
investigate options and any related costs.
Mayor
Studebaker presented a concept drawing provided by Riverside Ten, LLC
for redevelopment of the NiSource property which they have purchased.
Mayor Studebaker met with one of the principals of Riverside Ten, LLC
who reported they plan to move quickly with upgrades to the property.
The group hopes to have tenants in the main building by third or
fourth quarter 2011. The existing leases with Time Warner and Columbia
Gas remain in effect. He stated he expects three items to come before
Council for consideration.
1.
Expansion of the parking area,
2.
An
additional or replacement curb cut on Dublin Rd. designed to line up
with the main entrance of the building, and
3.
Variance(s) to allow construction of a small building on the northwest
corner of the property that could be a bank branch or a doctor/dentist
office.
The curb cut will be
an issue that must be addressed by the Village and by the Ohio
Department of Transportation because Dublin Rd./Route 33 is a federal
highway.
Mayor
Studebaker reported there has been interest expressed in the rear
portion of 1400 Dublin Rd. but nothing substantial to this point.
The
Village has been informed that the State of Ohio will be closing the
Department of Rehabilitation office located in 2200 W. Fifth Ave.
Ms. McKay
reported building permits have been issued for 2100 Marble Cliff
Office Park. She reported receiving a complaint about the condition of
the property and has contacted the property owner requesting the
property be cleaned up and maintained during the ongoing construction.
CONSENT AGENDA

Mr.
Cincione moved adoption of the Consent Agenda. Ms. Troiano seconded.
The Consent Agenda was adopted unanimously.
MAYOR’S REPORT
Mayor
Studebaker reported he has a conflict for the June regular meeting. He
asked Council members to consider alternate dates and report their
availability to the office.
Ms. McKay will send
out an email reminder. She also suggested that Council members provide
their summer vacation schedules.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland presented a schedule for completing the five components of
the requirements of the OEPA Directors Findings and Orders including
the items completed to date and all future requirements. He updated
Council on the current status of the various requirements.
Mr.
McFarland introduced an overview of the Findings and Orders
requirement to develop a Sanitary Sewer Capacity, Management,
Operation and Maintenance (CMOM) report for submission to the Ohio EPA
by February, 2012. Mr. McFarland stated he would like to get started
on the work by mid-year. He commented that much of the work already
completed for the SSES will be applicable to the CMOM report. A formal
proposal for the project will be presented at a future meeting. Mr.
McFarland left the meeting at this point.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr. Banchefsky had no
report for Council.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT’S REPORT
Mr.
Johannes presented a proposal from Ahlum and Arbor to spray the
Village crabapple and hawthorn trees with fungicide to maintain the
trees.
Mr. Kukura moved approval of the Ahlum and Arbor
proposal to apply fungicide spray to Village tree lawn trees at a
total cost of $1,245.00. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Mr. Johannes presented
a proposal to purchase bulk hardwood mulch for the Tarpy Woods paths.
Mr. Johannes has proposed the project of spreading the mulch to the
faculty advisor for the Grandview Heights senior class. If approved by
the class the work will be their class “Work Day” project to be
performed on May 24, 2011. Mr. Johannes is working with two companies
to determine the best cost for the mulch and the delivery.
Mr. Banchefsky
suggested that the volunteers sign the standard volunteer release form
prior to the commencement of the work.Ms.
Troiano moved approval of up to $900 for the purchase and delivery of
hardwood mulch for the Tarpy Woods path. Ms. Siefkas seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
Mr.
Johannes presented the 2010 Mayor’s Court Summary.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the March 2011 bills totaling $67,502.39. Ms. Troiano
seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
FISCAL OFFICER’S
REPORT
Ms. McKay presented several supplement appropriations for Council
review and approval.
Mr. Kukura moved
approval of the following supplemental appropriations:
$463.99 from
1000-559-399-0000 to 1000-549-399-0000 for Sanitary Sewer Maintenance
$9,000.00 from
1000-210-640-0000 to 1000-210-325-0000 to allow for memo receipting of
property taxes
$150.00 from
1000-740-610-0000 to 1000-740-325-0000 to allow for memo receipting of
property taxes.
Ms. Siefkas seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
Ms. McKay
asked Council if they would like her to gather quotes for the
2011-2012 insurance renewal. Council stated they would like to see
quotes this year. Ms. McKay will request insurance quotes from
multiple carriers including the current carrier.
Ms. McKay
presented the Franklin County report listing the intersections in each
community with the highest number of automobile crashes. W. Fifth Ave.
and Dublin Rd. is the intersection with the highest number of crashes
in Marble Cliff.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2288-11, An Ordinance
amending Section 136.04 (disorderly conduct) of the Code of Ordinances
of the Village of Marble Cliff, Ohio. Ms. Siefkas suggested the hours
of restriction on noise on Sunday be expanded. No action was taken.
Mr. Kukura
updated Council on the status of the Park Bond refinancing. He
explained that the fluctuating interest rates are making it difficult
to accurately calculate the Village’s net savings from the proposed
bond refinancing. Mr. Kukura reported Huntington Bank has expressed
interest in purchasing the bonds directly which would eliminate many
of the costs and fees associated with the reissue as proposed by Fifth
Third Bank. However, some costs have already been incurred with
Bricker and Eckler. He presented a proposal from Huntington Bank as
well as a revised proposal from Fifth Third. Mr. Kukura stated his
goal is to save the Village $100,000 over the next ten years.
Mr.
Banchefsky stated that the Ordinance O-2290-1, passed by Council on
February 25, 2011, does provide latitude for the Council to work with
the financial institution that provides the best rates and options.
Mr. Kukura explained and compared the two current proposals.
Council
discussed the options for making the final decision on the proposals
presented by Fifth Third and Huntington as well as addressing several
procedural questions. Mr. Cincione moved
Mayor Studebaker be authorized to review bond refinancing options and
approve the option most beneficial to the Village.
Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURN
Mr. Cincione moved the
meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Mayor Studebaker adjourned the meeting at 8:35 PM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2011
A special meeting of
the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Friday, February
25, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:30 am. Those
in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark, Matthew A.
Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W. Sterneker and
Kendy A. Troiano; Village Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky and Fiscal
Officer Cynthia McKay. Visitors were present.
Mr. Cincione moved
Mayor Studebaker be excused. Mr. Kukura seconded. The motion passed
unanimously.
Council
President Roark introduced the second reading of O-2286-11, An
Ordinance granting a conditional use permit for the use of the
property located at 1450 Dublin Road in the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mr. Cincione moved the
rules be suspended. Mr. Sterneker seconded. Mr. Cincione moved
Ordinance O-2286-11 be amended to add new section 2 specifying the
conditions under which the conditional use permit will expire. Mr.
Sterneker seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Cincione moved
the adoption of O-2286-11 as amended. Mr. Kukura seconded. The
motion passed unanimously.
Rebecca Princehorn of
Bricker and Eckler was present as bond counsel for the Village. She
explained the options and process for refinancing the remaining
$1,000,000 of the $2,000,000 bond issued in 2000 for the purchase of
the Tarpy Woods property.
Mr. Cincione asked for
clarification of the costs associated with refinancing. Mr.
Kukura explained the total amount of the reissue will be $1,050,000 to
cover the fees and expenses – including legal fees. The current
estimate of the Village’s savings is approximately $60,000 over the
remaining 10 years. Council discussed the need to monitor the savings
as the process moves forward to ensure that the refinancing continues
to be financially beneficial for the Village.
Ms. Princehorn
explained that the fees will include underwriting and regulatory fees
as well as legal and issuing fees. The other component is cost of the
offering statement (OS). Ms. Princehorn explained that much of that
information is readily available. She stated that the Village did not
do an OS as part of the offering ten years ago. She suggested the
Village discuss the need for an OS with 5th/3rd.
Mr. Roark asked Ms. Princehorn what the legal fees will be. She stated
approximately $15,000 without an OS and $25,000 with an OS.
Ms. Princehorn
explained there are a number of points along the process where the
reissuing process can be stopped. If the process is stopped, the
Village will have expenses that will not be absorbed into the reissue.
The legislation under
consideration is necessary to move the process forward.
Mr. Cincione asked if
the reissue process will create additional work for the office staff.
Ms. McKay stated her understanding that there will be limited
additional work.
Mr. Roark introduced
the first reading of Ordinance O-2290-11. Mr.
Cincione moved the rules be suspended. Ms. Troiano seconded. Ms.
Troiano moved approval of Ordinance O-2290-11. Mr. Cincione seconded.
The motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURN
Mr. Sterneker moved
the meeting be adjourned. Ms. Troiano seconded. The motion passed
unanimously. Council President Roark adjourned the meeting at 8:00
AM.
Approved
by:
Submitted by:
David T.
Roark
Cynthia A. McKay
Council President Pro Tem
Fiscal Officer
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 2011
The regular, scheduled
meeting of the Council of the Village of Marble Cliff was held Monday,
February 21, 2011 in the Village Hall at 1600 Fernwood Ave. at 7:00
pm. Those in attendance were: Council Members: David T. Roark,
Matthew A. Cincione, John F. Kukura, Linda J. Siefkas, Robert W.
Sterneker, and Kendy A. Troiano; Mayor Kent E. Studebaker, Village
Solicitor, Mitchell Banchefsky, Village Engineer, Louis McFarland,
Administrative Assistant, William Johannes, and Fiscal Officer Cynthia
McKay. Visitors were present.
VISITORS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced Brad Gamble from the Tri-Village Lion’s Noon
Club. Mr. Gamble explained the Tri-Village Lion’s Noon Club meets at
noon on the first Tuesday of each month at the MCI Cafeteria at
Kingsdale Shopping Center. The club is interested in expanding its
membership into the Marble Cliff community. He stated there are two
upcoming events that individuals interested in learning more about the
Lion’s Clubs are welcomed to attend. The first is their regular March
meeting and the second is the Pub Quiz trivia contest. He stated the
motto of the Lion’s Clubs is “We Serve.” They are the largest
world-wide volunteer organization. Local needs served by the
Tri-Village Club are Service Dogs of Central Ohio and the Ohio School
for the Blind. They also support the collection of used eyeglasses for
distribution in other parts of the world.
SOLICITOR’S REPORT
Mr.
Banchefsky updated Council regarding the letter of complaint filed by
Barry Thompson of Thompson Mechanical against the property owner at
1231 Cambridge Blvd. Mr. Banchefsky stated representatives of
Grandview Heights have met with Mr. Thompson and now consider the
issue closed.
Mr.
Banchefsky reported the Village has received a public records request
related to the universal income tax filing ordinance passed in
December 2010. The individual making the request asked if the tenant
information collected is considered a public record. Mr. Banchefsky
stated his opinion that, because the tenant reporting is part of the
income tax portion of the Village Code it is considered confidential.
Mr. Banchefsky and staff are formulating a response to the information
request.
ENGINEER’S REPORT
Mr.
McFarland reported the SSES report required by the EPA Findings and
Orders is complete. After analyzing the information in comparison to
bench marks established by the City of Columbus it was decided to
submit the report as the Village’s final SSES report. The EPA has
ninety days to accept the report or return the report for additional
work.
Mr. Sterneker arrived
at this point.
Mr.
McFarland reported that an emergency repair was performed on an 8 inch
sanitary sewer line at the rear of 1400 Dublin Rd. after the Village
was notified by NiSource. As part of the process the line was cleaned
and televised. This portion of the line had not been cleaned and
televised for many years and was one of the items identified in the
SSES report as future work to be completed by the Village. The process
revealed the location of two manholes which had become covered and
inaccessible and the need for an addition manhole where the line makes
a significant turn. Mr. McFarland suggested that future repair work
include removing trees and bushes from the sewer easement.
VISITORS – Cont.
Mr. Kukura
introduced the information he has collected regarding options to
refinance the park bonds issued in 2000. He explained the current
rates and his conversations with Red Capital, KeyBank and Fifth Third
Bank regarding the possibility of refinancing. Fifth Third Bank
expressed interest in pursuing the refinancing and prepared a proposal
which Mr. Kukura reviewed with Mayor Studebaker, Mr. Banchefsky and
Ms. McKay. Mr. Kukura introduced Tim Glasser and David Liggett from
Fifth Third to explain their proposal.
Mr.
Liggett explained the drop in interest makes the refinancing of the
remaining $1,000,000 of the Village 2000 Bonds very attractive. The
bank proposed refinancing $1,050,000 to cover the bonds and the costs
and fees associated with the reissuance. The proposed rate is 3.64% as
opposed to the average of 5.64% which is currently being paid by the
Village. He pointed out that there is significant pressure on interest
rates to move upward at this time. As currently proposed the
refinancing would save the Village approximately $60,000 over the next
ten years.
Mr.
Liggett explained the first step is for the Council to approve
legislation authorizing the process to proceed. The bank would then
prepare an offering statement and identify investors. Mr. Liggett
stated the whole process can be done in as little as 30 days. Mr.
Roark asked if there are costs associated even if the refinancing does
not go forward. Mr. Liggett stated there will be costs incurred that
the Village would be responsible for if the process does not go
forward. If the process is complete, those costs are paid through the
refinancing. Ms. Siefkas asked if the $60,000 savings is before or
after costs. Mr. Liggett stated that the savings is after the costs
and fees are paid.
Mr. Liggett explained
there is a banking fee, issuance and regulatory fees and legal fees.
The financing also includes paying the $10,000 penalty for calling the
bonds early.
Mr. Kukura
explained the Village could wait until next year which would eliminate
the penalty, but would risk that interest rates go higher. Mr.
Sterneker asked how far the interest rates would have to move to
eliminate any benefit of waiting until next year.
Mr. Liggett explained
that within the last few weeks the rates moved 40 basis points and
effectively eliminated $30,000 of potential saving to the Village. Mr.
Liggett stated that the new bonds would be reissued with no option for
early call. Ms. Troiano asked what Mr. Banchefsky’s level of
involvement would be. He stated very minimal because the Village will
retain separate bond counsel. The Village worked with Rebecca
Princehorn of Bricker and Eckler when the original bonds were issued.
Mr. Kukura
stated his opinion that the Village will benefit from moving forward.
Mr. Sterneker
concurred. Council discussed the time table and the options for
stopping the process if the benefit to the Village is eliminated by
increased interest rates. Council agreed that they would like to move
forward and called a special meeting on February 25, 2011 to consider
legislation necessary to move forward with refinancing the Village
2000 Bonds. Council also asked Mr. Banchefsky to contact Ms.
Princehorn to determine if she is willing to represent the Village as
bond counsel and draft the necessary legislation.
VARIANCES AND PERMITS
Mayor
Studebaker introduced the second reading of O-2285-11, An Ordinance
granting permission for installation of an in ground swimming pool and
swimming pool setback variance to Lori Smith for 1489 Arlington Ave.,
in the Village of Marble Cliff.
Mayor Studebaker reminded Council that there are two decisions to be
made; the approval of the pool and the variance to the 10 foot
required setback. Mrs. Smith distributed pictures of the property and
introduced Joe Hayes from Quality Pool.
Mr.
Sterneker asked Mr. and Mrs. Smith to address the concerns of noise,
drainage and landscaping that were raised at the January Council
meeting. Mr. Smith reviewed the pictures and explained where the pool
would be placed on the property and the location of the existing
drainage system. Mr. Hayes provided an example of the pool deck
drainage system and explained how that drainage system will be tied
into the existing drainage system. Mr. McFarland asked Mr. Smith to
explain the capacity of the existing drainage system. Mr. Smith stated
it is a four inch line and functions by gravity flow. Mrs. Smith
stated there is not water ponding in the yard during heavy rains.
Mr. Smith provided
pictures of the pool installed in the yard of Jeff Jones at 1315
Cambridge Blvd. and provided letters from Mr. Jones’ neighbors stating
they have not experienced undue runoff or ponding from the Jones pool
nor have they been concerned by excessive noise. Mr. Smith stated they
have included a row of arborvitae to improve the landscaping and add
to the noise buffer of the fence. He stated he does not expect the
pool to create more noise than that routinely created by children at
play.
Mr.
McFarland stated one of his concerns is the potential damage to the
existing drainage system during installation. He suggested the
language of the ordinance could be modified to address the ongoing
maintenance and repair of the drainage system.
Mr. Smith stated that
when the system was recently cleaned the flow was uninhibited in both
directions.
Richard
Dick, 2001 Cardigan Ave., stated that water ponds in the southeast
corner of their property under current conditions and stated his
opinion that without the ten foot setback it is the condition of their
property that is at risk. He also suggested that the Village take
action to protect the peace of the community by controlling noise.
Mrs. Dick stated that they are interested in maintaining the
undisturbed enjoyment of their yard.
Mr. Cincione arrived
at this point
Mr. Sterneker asked Mr.
and Mrs. Dick whether they are opposed to the pool or the variance or
both. Mr. Dick stated they are opposed to the setback variance. He
expressed his opinion that the
setback provides some protection to their property and that, without
the variance, the Smith’s will construct a smaller pool which would
not accommodate as large a group as the proposed pool.
Mr. Jones
stated they have never had any complaints about noise or water runoff
from their pool. He stated his opinion that the Smiths will be
sensitive and respectful of their neighbors and that Mr. Hayes can
address any drainage issues or problems that might come up as a result
of the construction of the proposed pool.
Paul
Giorgianni, 1538 Arlington Ave., expressed his support of the Smith’s
application for a pool. He stated his concern that a noise issue would
be an adequate concern to block the approval of the swimming pool. He
also stated his dismay that, in Marble Cliff, a neighbor or the
government would have the ability to veto a use of a neighbor’s
property.
Mr. Roark
asked why the pool could not be closer to the house. Mr. Smith stated
that relocation would require moving the air conditioning units and
might be too close to the foundation of the house.
Mayor
Studebaker stated that the Council is working with the rules and
|